Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disposable double-lumen tubes. A cost-effectiveness survey.

S P Linter

    Anaesthesia
    |February 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Disposable polyvinyl chloride double-lumen-bronchial tubes offer a cost-effective alternative to traditional red rubber tubes. Many hospitals can reduce expenditure by switching to these disposable options.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Is a drip necessary for a cholecystectomy?

    Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2009
    Same author

    Acute circulatory support.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1993
    Same author

    Wine and coronary heart disease.

    Lancet (London, England)·1992
    Same author

    Delayed excitatory reaction following interaction of cocaine and monoamine oxidase inhibitor (phenelzine).

    British journal of anaesthesia·1991
    Same author

    Depth of extradural space and dural puncture.

    Anaesthesia·1991
    Same author

    Anesthesia and mental illness.

    International journal of psychiatry in medicine·1990

    Area of Science:

    • Thoracic Surgery
    • Medical Device Technology
    • Healthcare Economics

    Background:

    • Red rubber double-lumen-bronchial tubes are commonly used in cardiothoracic procedures.
    • Assessing the cost-effectiveness of disposable alternatives is crucial for hospital resource management.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the viability and cost-effectiveness of disposable polyvinyl chloride (PVC) double-lumen-bronchial tubes compared to red rubber tubes.
    • To determine optimal material choices for double-lumen-bronchial tubes in different healthcare settings.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of tube usage and costs in a Regional Cardiothoracic Centre and three District General Hospitals.
    • Evaluation of the lifespan utilization and economic impact of both red rubber and disposable PVC tubes.

    Main Results:

    • Red rubber tubes were cost-effective in the Regional Cardiothoracic Centre due to frequent use.
    • In district hospitals, red rubber tubes were underutilized, making them less cost-effective.
    • Disposable PVC tubes presented a viable, cost-saving alternative for district general hospitals.

    Conclusions:

    • Switching to disposable PVC double-lumen-bronchial tubes can significantly reduce capital expenditure and annual costs for many district general hospitals.
    • Material choice for double-lumen-bronchial tubes should be tailored to institutional usage patterns for optimal cost-effectiveness.

    Related Experiment Videos