Clinical features and mortality outcomes of patients with MASLD only compared to those with MAFLD and MASLD

Mingqian Jiang1,2, Ziyan Pan1, Jacob George1

  • 1Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.

Hepatology International
|August 28, 2024
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) only represents a distinct patient group with unique health profiles and survival outcomes, differing from metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). This highlights the heterogeneity in liver disease classifications.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Metabolic Disorders
  • Public Health

Background:

  • The proposed definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) requires validation.
  • Current understanding of MASLD and its distinction from metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is incomplete.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the clinical profiles of individuals meeting MASLD criteria but not MAFLD criteria (MASLD-only).
  • To assess the long-term survival outcomes of the MASLD-only group.
  • To compare MASLD-only patients with other steatotic liver disease classifications.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III).
  • Inclusion of 7791 adult participants.
  • Categorization into four groups: no SLD, non-MAFLD MASLD, MASLD-MAFLD, and cryptogenic SLD.

Main Results:

  • The MASLD-only group exhibited younger age, better metabolic profiles, and less fibrosis compared to MASLD-MAFLD and no SLD groups.
  • MASLD-only profiles were comparable to cryptogenic SLD.
  • Lower cumulative incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was observed in the MASLD-only group.
  • Clustering analysis revealed distinct grouping for MASLD-only compared to MASLD-MAFLD.

Conclusions:

  • MASLD-only constitutes a clinically distinct entity.
  • This group demonstrates significant heterogeneity compared to patients identified solely by MAFLD criteria.
  • The findings underscore the importance of refining liver disease classifications.