Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2025

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
Published on: February 2, 2020
Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis: Infodemiological Study
1Preventative Dentistry Department, College of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Insights
Arabic websites on halitosis offer highly readable content but lack quality and credibility. Improving the availability of reliable health information is crucial for Arabic-speaking populations.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Digital Health Communication
- Medical Information Quality
Background:
- Halitosis, or bad breath, is a prevalent concern impacting many individuals.
- The internet is a primary source for health information globally.
- Assessing online health information quality is vital for public health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality and readability of Arabic online health content related to halitosis.
- To identify gaps in the reliability and comprehensiveness of this information.
- To inform strategies for enhancing digital health literacy.
Main Methods:
- Searched Google for Arabic halitosis websites using common search terms.
- Assessed website quality using Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria, DISCERN tool, and Health on the Net Foundation (HONcode) certification.
- Evaluated readability using Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL).
Main Results:
- Most examined websites (87.4%) failed to meet JAMA quality standards, lacking authorship, references, disclosure, and currency.
- The DISCERN tool indicated moderate to low quality for most sites (90.9%), with none achieving high scores.
- No websites held HONcode certification, raising concerns about trustworthiness.
- Readability was high, with over 90% of sites scoring well on FRE and SMOG, and 67.7% on FKGL.
- Significant correlations were found between DISCERN scores and website length, and between sentence count and readability scores.
Conclusions:
- Arabic websites on halitosis demonstrate excellent readability but suffer from poor quality and a lack of credibility.
- There is a significant need to develop and disseminate high-quality, reliable health information on halitosis for Arabic-speaking audiences.
- Improving the availability and trustworthiness of online health resources is essential for effective public health communication.
Background:
Halitosis, characterized by an undesirable mouth odor, represents a common concern.
Objective:
This study aims to assess the quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on halitosis as the internet is becoming a prominent global source of medical information.
Methods:
A total of 300 Arabic websites were retrieved from Google using 3 commonly used phrases for halitosis in Arabic. The quality of the websites was assessed using benchmark criteria established by the Journal of the American Medical Association, the DISCERN tool, and the presence of the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode). The assessment of readability (Flesch Reading Ease [FRE], Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level [FKGL]) was conducted using web-based readability indexes.
Results:
A total of 127 websites were examined. Regarding quality assessment, 87.4% (n=111) of websites failed to fulfill any Journal of the American Medical Association requirements, highlighting a lack of authorship (authors' contributions), attribution (references), disclosure (sponsorship), and currency (publication date). The DISCERN tool had a mean score of 34.55 (SD 7.46), with the majority (n=72, 56.6%) rated as moderate quality, 43.3% (n=55) as having a low score, and none receiving a high DISCERN score, indicating a general inadequacy in providing quality health information to make decisions and treatment choices. No website had HONcode certification, emphasizing the concern over the credibility and trustworthiness of these resources. Regarding readability assessment, Arabic halitosis websites had high readability scores, with 90.5% (n=115) receiving an FRE score ≥80, 98.4% (n=125) receiving a Simple Measure of Gobbledygook score <7, and 67.7% (n=86) receiving an FKGL score <7. There were significant correlations between the DISCERN scores and the quantity of words (P<.001) and sentences (P<.001) on the websites. Additionally, there was a significant relationship (P<.001) between the number of sentences and FKGL and FRE scores.
Conclusions:
While readability was found to be very good, indicating that the information is accessible to the public, the quality of Arabic halitosis websites was poor, reflecting a significant gap in providing reliable and comprehensive health information. This highlights the need for improving the availability of high-quality materials to ensure Arabic-speaking populations have access to reliable information about halitosis and its treatment options, tying quality and availability together as critical for effective health communication.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Oral Cavity
Teeth: The teeth are the hardest structures in our bodies. Humans have two sets of teeth throughout their lifetime: deciduous (baby) teeth and permanent teeth. Each tooth consists of several parts: the crown (visible part), the root (embedded in the jaw), enamel (hard outer...
Health Literacy
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract I: Health History
Subjective Data
Subjective data provides vital information about the patient's health history and symptoms. This data is typically collected through interviews in which patients describe their experiences, symptoms, and concerns.
Health history and...

