Identify the most appropriate imputation method for handling missing values in clinical structured datasets: a systematic review
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Marziyeh Afkanpour1, Elham Hosseinzadeh1, Hamed Tabesh2
1Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Background And Objectives:
Comprehending the research dataset is crucial for obtaining reliable and valid outcomes. Health analysts must have a deep comprehension of the data being analyzed. This comprehension allows them to suggest practical solutions for handling missing data, in a clinical data source. Accurate handling of missing values is critical for producing precise estimates and making informed decisions, especially in crucial areas like clinical research. With data's increasing diversity and complexity, numerous scholars have developed a range of imputation techniques. To address this, we conducted a systematic review to introduce various imputation techniques based on tabular dataset characteristics, including the mechanism, pattern, and ratio of missingness, to identify the most appropriate imputation methods in the healthcare field.
Materials And Methods:
We searched four information databases namely PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore, for articles published up to September 20, 2023, that discussed imputation methods for addressing missing values in a clinically structured dataset. Our investigation of selected articles focused on four key aspects: the mechanism, pattern, ratio of missingness, and various imputation strategies. By synthesizing insights from these perspectives, we constructed an evidence map to recommend suitable imputation methods for handling missing values in a tabular dataset.
Results:
Out of 2955 articles, 58 were included in the analysis. The findings from the development of the evidence map, based on the structure of the missing values and the types of imputation methods used in the extracted items from these studies, revealed that 45% of the studies employed conventional statistical methods, 31% utilized machine learning and deep learning methods, and 24% applied hybrid imputation techniques for handling missing values.
Conclusion:
Considering the structure and characteristics of missing values in a clinical dataset is essential for choosing the most appropriate data imputation technique, especially within conventional statistical methods. Accurately estimating missing values to reflect reality enhances the likelihood of obtaining high-quality and reusable data, contributing significantly to precise medical decision-making processes. Performing this review study creates a guideline for choosing the most appropriate imputation methods in data preprocessing stages to perform analytical processes on structured clinical datasets.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Censoring Survival Data
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

