Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

08:54
Author Spotlight: Understanding Age-Related Macular Degeneration Pathophysiology with QAF Workflow
Published on: May 26, 2023
1.4K
Measuring Geographic Atrophy Area Using Column-Based Machine Learning Software on Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence
Or Shmueli1, Adi Szeskin2, Ilan Benhamou2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Ein-Karem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 29, 2024
Summary
Geographic atrophy (GA) area measurements differ significantly between fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging in dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). OCT measurements were consistently smaller than FAF measurements, highlighting imaging modality differences.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Retinal Diseases
Background:
- Dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is characterized by geographic atrophy (GA).
- Accurate measurement of GA is crucial for monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy.
- Current imaging modalities like fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are used for GA assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare semi-automatic GA area measurements between FAF and OCT using the cRORA criteria.
- To evaluate differences in GA characteristics (area, focality, perimeter, etc.) derived from FAF versus OCT.
Main Methods:
- Semi-automatic annotation of GA findings on FAF and OCT scans from 36 eyes with dry AMD.
- Comparison of quantitative GA parameters including area, perimeter, and diameters between the two modalities.
- Multivariate regression analysis to identify factors correlating with measurement discrepancies.
Main Results:
- GA area measured on OCT (4.74 ± 3.80 mm²) was significantly smaller than on FAF (13.47 ± 8.64 mm²).
- A significant correlation was found between the difference in GA area measurements and baseline lesion perimeter, maximal diameter on OCT, and total lesion area on FAF.
- Multivariate analysis indicated that lesion characteristics significantly influenced the discrepancy between OCT and FAF measurements.
Conclusions:
- Significant differences exist in GA area measurements obtained via FAF and OCT.
- The choice of imaging modality impacts GA area quantification.
- Further research is needed to establish the clinical significance of these measurement discrepancies.

