Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Subcutaneous versus Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease
Fabian Schiedat1,2, Benjamin Meuterodt3, Joachim Winter4
1Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, Academic Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, 45886 Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
Insights
Subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICD) show fewer infections and hospitalizations in dialysis patients compared to transvenous ICDs (TV-ICD). This suggests S-ICD may offer better long-term outcomes for this high-risk group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis face high risks of infection and mortality with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).
- Comparing subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) and transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) is crucial for optimizing care in this vulnerable population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare long-term complications and outcomes between S-ICD and TV-ICD recipients with ESRD requiring dialysis.
- To evaluate device-associated infections, hospitalizations, and mortality rates in these patient groups.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 43 ESRD patients on dialysis who received either S-ICD (26) or TV-ICD (17).
- Bi-annual follow-up over a median of 95.6 months, confirming data with treating physicians.
Main Results:
- TV-ICD recipients experienced significantly more device-associated infections (HR 8.72) and hospitalizations (HR 10.20).
- Cardiovascular mortality was higher in the TV-ICD group (HR 9.17), with more overall hospitalizations (HR 2.59).
- No significant difference in overall mortality was observed between the S-ICD and TV-ICD groups.
Conclusions:
- S-ICD implantation is associated with statistically fewer device infections and hospitalizations in ESRD patients on dialysis.
- S-ICD may be a safer alternative, offering lower cardiac mortality compared to TV-ICD in this high-risk cohort.
Background:
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD). Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis are at a very high risk of infection from cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation as well as mortality. In the present study, we compared the long-term complications and outcomes between subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) and transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) recipients.
Methods:
In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed a total of 43 patients with ESRD requiring dialysis who received either a prophylactic S-ICD (26 patients) or a single right ventricular lead TV-ICD (17 patients) at seven experienced centers in Germany. Follow-up was performed bi-annually, at the end of which the data concerning comorbidities and, if applicable, reason for death were checked and confirmed with patients' general practitioner, nephrologist and cardiologist.
Results:
The median follow up duration was 95.6 months (range 42.8-126.3 months). Baseline characteristics were without noteworthy significant differences between groups. During follow-up (FU), there were significantly more device-associated infections (HR 8.72, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18 to 12.85, p < 0.05) and device-associated hospitalizations (HR 10.20, 95% CI 1.22 to 84.61, p < 0.001), as well as a higher cardiovascular mortality (HR 9.17, 95% CI 1.12 to 8.33, p < 0.05), in the TV-ICD group. The number of patients requiring hospitalization for any reason was significantly higher in the TV-ICD group (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.12 to 6.41, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in overall mortality (HR 1.92, 95% CI 0.96 to 6.15, p = 0.274).
Conclusions:
Our data suggest that, in this extended follow-up in seriously compromised renal patients on dialysis, the S-ICD patients have statistically fewer device infections and hospitalizations as well as lower cardiac mortality compared with the TV-ICD cohort.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications

