Correlation between Dental Composite Filler Percentage and Strength, Modulus, Shrinkage Stress, Translucency, Depth...

Filler content in dental composites is credited for affecting its physical and mechanical properties. This study evaluated the correlation between the filler percentage and strength, modulus, shrinkage stress, depth of cure, translucency and radiopacity of commercially available high- and low-viscosity dental composites. Filler weight percentage (wt%) was determined through the burned ash technique (800 °C for 15 min). Three-point bend flexural strength and modulus were measured according to ISO 4049 with 2 mm × 2 mm × 25 mm bars. Shrinkage stress was evaluated using a universal testing machine in which composite was polymerized through two transparent acrylic rods 2 mm apart. Shrinkage was measured from the maximum force following 500 s. The translucency parameter (TP) was measured as the difference in color (ΔE00) of 1 mm thick specimens against white and black tiles. The depth of cure was measured according to ISO 4049 in a cylindrical metal mold (4 mm diameter) with a 10 s cure. Radiopacity was measured by taking a digital X-ray (70 kVp for 0.32 s at 400 mm distance) of 1 mm thick specimens and comparing the radiopacity to an aluminum step wedge using image analysis software. The correlation between the filler wt% and properties was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient using SPSS. There was a positive linear correlation between the filler wt% and modulus (r = 0.78, p < 0.01), flexural strength (r = 0.46, p < 0.01) and radiopacity (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) and negative correlation with translucency (r = -0.29, p < 0.01). Filler wt% best predicts the modulus and strength and, to a lesser extent, the radiopacity and translucency. All but two of the high- and low-viscosity composites from the same manufacturer had statistically equivalent strengths as each other; however, the high-viscosity materials almost always had a statistically higher modulus. For two of the flowable composites measured from the same manufacturer (3M and Dentsply), there was a lower shrinkage stress in the bulk-fill version of the material but not for the other two manufacturers (Ivoclar and Tokuyama). All flowable bulk-fill composites achieved a deeper depth of cure than the flowable composite from the same manufacturer other than Omnichroma Flow Bulk.