Comparative Study of the Structural, Microstructural, and Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Pastes Obtained from...

This study compares the structural, microstructural, thermal, and mechanical properties of geopolymer pastes (GPs) created through traditional methods and those derived from ready-to-use powders for geopolymer (RUPG) materials. The metakaolin (MK) precursor was activated using a sodium silicate solution or CaO and MOH (where M is Na or K). Various ratios of precursor/activator and Na₂SiO₃ or CaO/MOH were tested to determine the optimal combination. For RUPG, the MK precursor was activated by replacing the sodium silicate solution with quicklime. Metakaolin, alkaline hydroxide, and quicklime powders were mixed at different CaO ratios (wt%) and subjected to extensive ball milling to produce RUPG. The RUPG was then hydrated, molded, and cured at 20 °C and 50% relative humidity until testing. Analytical methods were used to characterize the raw and synthesized materials. Classic geopolymers (CGPs) activated with quicklime burst after one hour of molding. The results indicated slight amorphization of GP compared to raw MK, as confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis, showing N(K)-A-S-H in CGP and N(K)-A-S-H with calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H/C-A-S-H) in RUPG. The compressive strength of MK-based geopolymers reached 31.45 MPa and 34.92 MPa for GP and CGP, respectively, after 28 days of curing.