Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Enrich and Expand Rare Antigen-specific T Cells with Magnetic Nanoparticles
Published on: November 17, 2018
Tumor Neoepitope-Based Vaccines: A Scoping Review on Current Predictive Computational Strategies
Luiz Gustavo do Nascimento Rocha1,2, Paul Anderson Souza Guimarães1,2, Maria Gabriela Reis Carvalho1,2
1Biologia Computacional e Sistemas (BCS), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Abstract:
Therapeutic cancer vaccines have been considered in recent decades as important immunotherapeutic strategies capable of leading to tumor regression. In the development of these vaccines, the identification of neoepitopes plays a critical role, and different computational methods have been proposed and employed to direct and accelerate this process. In this context, this review identified and systematically analyzed the most recent studies published in the literature on the computational prediction of epitopes for the development of therapeutic vaccines, outlining critical steps, along with the associated program's strengths and limitations. A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Searches were performed in databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct) using the keywords: neoepitope, epitope, vaccine, prediction, algorithm, cancer, and tumor. Forty-nine articles published from 2012 to 2024 were synthesized and analyzed. Most of the identified studies focus on the prediction of epitopes with an affinity for MHC I molecules in solid tumors, such as lung carcinoma. Predicting epitopes with class II MHC affinity has been relatively underexplored. Besides neoepitope prediction from high-throughput sequencing data, additional steps were identified, such as the prioritization of neoepitopes and validation. Mutect2 is the most used tool for variant calling, while NetMHCpan is favored for neoepitope prediction. Artificial/convolutional neural networks are the preferred methods for neoepitope prediction. For prioritizing immunogenic epitopes, the random forest algorithm is the most used for classification. The performance values related to the computational models for the prediction and prioritization of neoepitopes are high; however, a large part of the studies still use microbiome databases for training. The in vitro/in vivo validations of the predicted neoepitopes were verified in 55% of the analyzed studies. Clinical trials that led to successful tumor remission were identified, highlighting that this immunotherapeutic approach can benefit these patients. Integrating high-throughput sequencing, sophisticated bioinformatics tools, and rigorous validation methods through in vitro/in vivo assays as well as clinical trials, the tumor neoepitope-based vaccine approach holds promise for developing personalized therapeutic vaccines that target specific tumor cancers.
Insights
Computational methods accelerate the identification of neoepitopes for therapeutic cancer vaccines. This review analyzes prediction tools, highlighting NetMHCpan and neural networks, and emphasizes the promise of personalized vaccines for tumor regression.
Area of Science:
- Immunology and Bioinformatics
- Computational vaccinology
- Oncology
Background:
- Therapeutic cancer vaccines aim to induce tumor regression through immunotherapy.
- Identifying specific neoepitopes is crucial for developing effective cancer vaccines.
- Computational methods are increasingly used to predict and accelerate neoepitope discovery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and analyze recent computational methods for neoepitope prediction in therapeutic vaccine development.
- To outline critical steps, strengths, and limitations of current neoepitope prediction programs.
- To assess the validation and clinical translation of computationally predicted neoepitopes.
Main Methods:
- A scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR extension was conducted.
- Searches were performed in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct using keywords: neoepitope, epitope, vaccine, prediction, algorithm, cancer, tumor.
- Forty-nine articles published between 2012 and 2024 were synthesized and analyzed.
Main Results:
- Most studies focus on predicting epitopes binding to MHC class I molecules in solid tumors; MHC class II prediction is underexplored.
- Mutect2 (variant calling) and NetMHCpan (epitope prediction) are commonly used tools, with artificial/convolutional neural networks being preferred prediction methods.
- Random forest algorithms are favored for prioritizing immunogenic epitopes; 55% of studies included in vitro/in vivo validation, and some clinical trials showed tumor remission.
Conclusions:
- Computational neoepitope prediction shows high performance, but challenges remain, including the use of microbiome databases for training.
- Integrating advanced bioinformatics tools with rigorous validation is essential for developing personalized neoepitope-based therapeutic cancer vaccines.
- Neoepitope-based vaccines hold significant promise for personalized cancer immunotherapy, with demonstrated potential for clinical benefit and tumor regression.
More Related Videos
10:18Author Spotlight: Magnetic Fluorescent Bead-Based Dual-Reporter Flow Analysis of PDL1-Vaxx Peptide Vaccine-Induced Antibody Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction
Published on: July 7, 2023
12:42Paramyxoviruses for Tumor-targeted Immunomodulation: Design and Evaluation Ex Vivo
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...