Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eddy Currents01:25

Eddy Currents

Since eddy currents occur only in conductors, magnets can separate metals from other materials. For example, in a recycling center, trash is dumped in batches down a ramp, beneath which lies a powerful magnet. Conductors in the trash are slowed by eddy currents, while nonmetals in the trash move on, separating from the metals. This works for all metals, not just ferromagnetic ones.
Other major applications of eddy currents appear in metal detectors and the braking systems of trains and roller...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Novel Spatter Detection Algorithm for Real-Time Quality Control in Laser-Directed Energy Deposition-Based Additive Manufacturing.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Convolutional Neural Networks to Assess Steno-Occlusive Disease Using Cerebrovascular Reactivity.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Non-Destructive Testing Using Eddy Current Sensors for Defect Detection in Additively Manufactured Titanium and Stainless-Steel Parts.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Development of an Electromagnetic Micromanipulator Levitation System for Metal Additive Manufacturing Applications.

Micromachines·2022
Same author

Design and Fabrication of a Magnetic Actuator for Torque and Force Control Estimated by the ANN/SA Algorithm.

Micromachines·2022
Same author

Template-Enabled Biofabrication of Thick 3D Tissues with Patterned Perfusable Macrochannels.

Advanced healthcare materials·2021
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
11:34

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography

Published on: May 15, 2017

11.1K

Eddy Current Sensor Probe Design for Subsurface Defect Detection in Additive Manufacturing.

Heba E Farag1, Mir Behrad Khamesee1, Ehsan Toyserkani1

  • 1Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an eddy current probe for detecting internal defects like pores and cracks in additively manufactured parts. The new probe design successfully identified artificial flaws, enhancing quality control in additive manufacturing.

Keywords:
additive manufacturingeddy currentnon-destructive testingprobe design

More Related Videos

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors
06:17

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors

Published on: January 16, 2020

5.7K
Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
11:34

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography

Published on: May 15, 2017

11.1K
Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors
06:17

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors

Published on: January 16, 2020

5.7K
Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Non-Destructive Testing
  • Additive Manufacturing

Background:

  • Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes, like laser powder bed fusion, often result in internal defects such as pores and cracks.
  • These defects compromise the durability and reliability of AM-produced parts.
  • Early detection of defects is crucial for real-time process control and improved product quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a novel eddy current-based probe for detecting subsurface defects in additively manufactured components.
  • To optimize the probe design using electromagnetic finite element analysis.
  • To assess the probe's capability in identifying artificial defects mimicking pores and cracks.

Main Methods:

  • Electromagnetic finite element analysis was employed for probe geometry optimization.
  • A prototype eddy current probe was fabricated based on the optimized design.
  • Artificial defects (blind holes and notches) were introduced into stainless steel plates to simulate manufacturing flaws.
  • The probe's performance was evaluated by detecting defects of varying dimensions at a specific depth.

Main Results:

  • The eddy current probe successfully detected artificial defects, including blind holes with a 0.17 mm radius and notches with a 0.43 mm width and 5 mm length.
  • Detection was achieved for defects located 0.5 mm below the surface, with the probe positioned on the back surface.
  • The method demonstrated effectiveness even on samples with a surface roughness below 2 µm.

Conclusions:

  • The developed eddy current probe shows significant promise for the in-situ detection of pores and cracks in additively manufactured parts.
  • This technology offers a potential solution for real-time quality control in additive manufacturing processes.
  • Further application in the additive manufacturing industry for non-destructive evaluation is indicated.