Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
A methodological proof-of-concept of the teeter-totter effect
Ashna Subramanium1, Jordyn Vienneau1, Sandro R Nigg1
1Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract:
The Nike Vaporfly 4% (VP4) shoe is popular due to its unique design and reported performance benefits. However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the improvements remain unclear. One proposed mechanism is the teeter-totter effect. This study aimed to 1) experimentally test the teeter-totter theory by estimating the teeter-totter moment (MTT) in the VP4 compared to a flat shoe (CONTROL) and 2) quantify the change in the anterior-posterior position of the centre of pressure (Δxa-p) in the VP4 compared to the CONTROL. Plantar pressures and high-speed video were recorded from 15 runners in two shoe conditions. The VP4 generated a larger propulsion moment, MP, ( = 90.46 ± 38.87 Nms; p < 0.001, d = 1.95), suggesting the presence of an MTT in the VP4 ( = 57.16 ± 24.35 Nms) when compared to the CONTROL ( = 33.30 ± 14.52 Nms). Δxa-p was greater in the VP4 (Δxa-p = 9.48 ± 6.08 mm; p < 0.001, d = 2.07) compared to the CONTROL (Δxa-p = 0.54 ± 0.67 mm). This study provides a methodological proof-of-concept for the teeter-totter theory. The findings highlight the possibility of a teeter-totter effect resulting in greater heel propulsion while running in an AFT shoe construction, assuming a constant muscle moment and pivot point.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Social Proof
Stability of structures
Torsional Pendulum
As long as the rigid body's angular displacement is small, its oscillation can be modeled as a linear angular oscillation. The amplitude of the oscillation is an angle. The role of mass is played...

