Political rule (vs. opposition) predicts whether ideological prejudice is stronger in U.S. conservatives or progressives
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Ideological prejudice, or viewing dissimilar groups negatively, varied over time. It was stronger in conservatives historically but shifted, becoming stronger in progressives more recently, influenced by political party in power.
Area Of Science
- Social Psychology
- Political Psychology
- American Politics
Background
- Ideological prejudice, where individuals view dissimilar groups negatively, is a significant factor in societal divisions.
- Understanding the asymmetry of ideological prejudice between conservatives and progressives is crucial for political science and social psychology.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate whether ideological prejudice is stronger in conservatives, progressives, or neither within the United States.
- To explore the reasons behind the observed heterogeneity and asymmetry in ideological prejudice.
Main Methods
- Analysis of the American National Election Studies (1972–2021).
- Examination of studies related to the agency-beliefs-communion model (2016–2021).
- Conducting two new studies to test explanations for contradictory findings.
Main Results
- Historically (1972–2021), ideological prejudice was stronger among conservatives.
- More recently (2016–2021), studies indicated stronger ideological prejudice among progressives.
- Political party in power (ruling vs. opposition) was identified as a key factor influencing this shift.
Conclusions
- Ideological prejudice in the U.S. is not static and exhibits asymmetric patterns.
- The political context, specifically which party holds power, significantly influences whether conservatives or progressives exhibit stronger ideological prejudice.
- Findings challenge previous assumptions and highlight the dynamic nature of intergroup political attitudes.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
The phenomenon of group polarization explains many actions taken by groups that...
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
According to the law of conservation of energy, any transition between kinetic and potential energy conserves the total energy of the system. Hence, the work done by a conservative force is completely reversible. It is path independent, which means that we can start and stop at any two points in the transition, and the total energy of the system (kinetic plus potential energy at these points) will remain conserved. This is characteristic of a conservative force. Some important examples of...
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
A good example of social proof is from laugh tracks on television shows. Fullery & Skeffington (1974) found that adding group laughter sounds to material increased how humorous the participants perceived that material, regardless of whether the content itself was funny or not. By adding a laugh...
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...