Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing Research on Candida albicans Biofilm-Associated Prosthetic Joint Infections
Published on: February 2, 2024
Is the Orthopaedic Trauma Association-Open Fracture Classification Better Than the Gustilo-Anderson Classification at
Philip Khoury1, Nina Hazra, Anthony DeMartino
1Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Objectives:
To investigate and compare the predictive ability of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association-Open Fracture Classification (OTA-OFC) and the Gustilo-Anderson classification systems for fracture-related infections (FRI) in patients with open tibia fractures.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Academic trauma center.
Patient Selection Criteria:
Patients aged 16 years or older with an operatively treated open tibia fracture (OTA-AO 41, 42, and 43) between 2010 and 2021.
Outcome Measures And Comparisons:
The primary outcome was FRI. The OTA-OFC and the Gustilo-Anderson classifications were compared in their ability to predict FRI.
Results:
Eight hundred ninety patients (mean age, 43 years [range, 17 to 96]; 75% men) with 912 open tibia fractures were included. In total, 142 (16%) had an infection. The OTA-OFC was not significantly better at predicting FRI than the Gustilo-Anderson classification (area under the curve, 0.66 vs. 0.66; P = 0.89). The Gustilo-Anderson classification was a stronger predictor of FRI than any single OTA-OFC domain, explaining 72% of FRI variance. Only the addition of the OTA-OFC wound contamination domain to Gustilo-Anderson significantly increased the variance explained (72% vs. 84%, P = 0.04). Embedded contamination increased the risk of FRI by approximately 10% as the risk of FRI with embedded contamination was 16% for type I or type IIs, 26% for type IIIAs, 45% for type IIIBs, and 46% for type IIICs.
Conclusions:
The more complex OTA-OFC system was not better than the Gustilo-Anderson classification system in predicting FRIs in patients with open tibia fractures. Adding embedded wound contamination to the Gustilo-Anderson classification system significantly improved its prognostic ability.
Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
