Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

64
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
64
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

56
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
56
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

23
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
23
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.5K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.5K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

85
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
85

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Traumatic abdominal wall injuries in postmortem CT.

International journal of legal medicine·2026
Same author

Comparative image quality evaluation of unenhanced postmortem Photon-Counting CT and Energy-Integrating CT.

Forensic science, medicine, and pathology·2025
Same author

Remains of the German outlaw Johannes Bückler alias Schinderhannes identified by an interdisciplinary approach.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2025
Same author

Improving forensic healthcare: ARMED, a new telemedical examination.

International journal of legal medicine·2025
Same author

[Forensic radiology].

Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2024
Same author

Bismuth Shielding in Head Computed Tomography-Still Necessary?

Journal of clinical medicine·2024
Same journal

The radiographic bubbly fecal pattern of intestinal pneumatosis in newborns revisited.

Pediatric radiology·2026
Same journal

Regional differences in fetal fat accretion in small-for-gestational-age fetuses assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Pediatric radiology·2026
Same journal

Thermal ablation of lung metastases in children: what every paediatric radiologist should know.

Pediatric radiology·2026
Same journal

Prediction of early recurrence in primary intussusception: development of an ultrasound-based radiomics and deep learning nomogram.

Pediatric radiology·2026
Same journal

Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 long term outcomes study: chest radiographic and computed tomography findings at baseline.

Pediatric radiology·2026
Same journal

Pediatric radiology informatics within a larger academic practice.

Pediatric radiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

Let us talk about mistakes.

Erich Sorantin1, Michael Georg Grasser2, Ariane Hemmelmayr2

  • 1Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34, 8036, Graz, Austria. erich.sorantin@medunigraz.at.

Pediatric Radiology
|August 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Medical errors in radiology harm patients and increase costs. This study classifies error sources, influencing factors like cognitive biases and work environment, and proposes prevention strategies to improve patient safety and team well-being.

Keywords:
Cognitive psychologyDiagnostic errorsEquipment and suppliesLeadershipRadiology

More Related Videos

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

20.8K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

20.8K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical error analysis
  • Radiology patient safety
  • Healthcare quality improvement

Background:

  • Errors and mistakes are inherent in healthcare, potentially leading to patient harm and increased costs.
  • Sources of errors can be categorized as systematic, latent, or active, influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors.
  • Cognitive biases, personality, socialization, chronobiology, and thinking styles (heuristic vs. analytical) significantly impact decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and classify errors and mistakes within the field of radiology.
  • To identify and discuss the multifaceted factors influencing these errors.
  • To present evidence-based strategies for error prevention in radiology.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of existing research on medical errors.
  • Classification of error types (systematic, latent, active) and contributing factors.
  • Analysis of psychological, personal, and environmental influences on diagnostic accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Errors in radiology stem from diverse sources including cognitive biases, personal factors, and complex work environments.
  • Systematic, latent, and active errors are identified, with intrinsic and extrinsic factors playing crucial roles.
  • Overload from personal situations, long commutes, and IT complexity are significant contributors.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding and classifying radiology errors is essential for developing effective prevention strategies.
  • Addressing individual cognitive and personal factors, alongside systemic and environmental issues, is key to reducing medical mistakes.
  • Promoting team well-being and clear hierarchical responsibilities can enhance patient safety and reduce errors in radiology.