Evaluation of Infection Preventionists' Competencies Using the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and...

Introduction Infection preventionists (IPs) are healthcare workers (HCWs) who received specialized training in infection prevention and control (IPC) to be able to deliver specific tasks to prevent and control infection transmission to patients, HCWs, and visitors in all healthcare settings. Most IPs started their professional life as nurses, physicians, microbiology, public health, or allied health specialties before moving to the IPC field, not necessarily with specialized training or diploma, which may need more focus on unified competency tool to evaluate their skills and strengths and improve IPC program outcome. Aim This study aimed to examine IPs' self-rated competency level using the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) core competencies and to determine what factors influence the level of competency among IPs in Government Hospitals (GHs) in Manama, Bahrain. Subject and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among non-certified IPs in Bahrain's GHs. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed among the targeted IPs using the Microsoft 365 form (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA). The questionnaire includes socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., age, gender, years of experience, etc.), the APIC competency tool to assess IP competency, and the perceived effectiveness of the IPC program. Results Of the 17 IPs, 88.2% were females, and 47.1% were between 31 and 35 years old. Among the eight APIC core competencies, management and communication had the highest mean percentage score (84.2%), followed by preventing/controlling the transmission of infectious diseases (84.1%) and the identification of infectious disease processes (81.5%). The total mean competency score was 142.8 (SD: 20.3), with 70.6% classified as having a good level of competency. Increasing years of IP experience was the only factor associated with increased competency scores. Conclusion The level of IPC competency among "novice" or "becoming" proficient IPs was sufficient. Using the APIC competency tool, IPs showed competence in managing and communicating, preventing or controlling transmission of infectious agents, identifying infectious disease processes, and surveillance and epidemiologic investigations. Further research is needed to give more insights into the level of IPC competency of IPs in our region.