Atrial cardiopathy biomarkers and atrial fibrillation in the ARCADIA trial

Hooman Kamel1, Mitchell Sv Elkind2,3, Richard A Kronmal4

  • 1Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Department of Neurology and Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

European Stroke Journal
|August 30, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Biomarkers for atrial cardiopathy moderately predicted atrial fibrillation (AF) in cryptogenic stroke patients. This finding offers insights into the ARCADIA trial

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Neurology
  • Biomarker Research

Background:

  • The ARCADIA trial investigated apixaban versus aspirin for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy.
  • A neutral trial result may stem from suboptimal atrial cardiopathy identification using biomarkers.
  • This study evaluates biomarker associations with subsequent atrial fibrillation (AF) detection, a key indicator of atrial cardiopathy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the predictive value of established atrial cardiopathy biomarkers for subsequent AF detection in cryptogenic stroke patients.
  • To examine the relationship between specific biomarker levels and the occurrence of AF.
  • To inform future trial design and patient selection for secondary stroke prevention.

Main Methods:

  • Patients meeting atrial cardiopathy criteria (P-wave terminal force in lead V1 [PTFV1], NT-proBNP, or left atrial diameter index [LADI]) were included.
  • AF detection via routine care served as the primary outcome.
  • Multivariable regression analyses assessed the association of biomarkers, demographics, and risk factors with AF detection.

Main Results:

  • Of 3745 screened patients, 254 were diagnosed with AF. Biomarkers including NT-proBNP, PTFV1, and LADI were associated with AF in unadjusted analyses.
  • In multivariable models, age, NT-proBNP, and LADI remained significantly associated with AF.
  • The combined biomarker model demonstrated moderate predictive ability (c-statistic 0.82) but had modest calibration.

Conclusions:

  • Biomarkers used to define atrial cardiopathy in the ARCADIA trial showed moderate predictive capability for subsequent AF detection.
  • These findings suggest that while useful, current biomarkers may require refinement for optimal identification of patients at high risk for AF-related stroke.
  • Further research is warranted to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for atrial cardiopathy.
Abstract