Integrating Complaint Analysis into Hospital Management: A Comparative Study of Surgical and Non-Surgical Complaints

Aims/Background: In an era where patient-centred care is paramount, effectively managing and analyzing hospital complaints is crucial for improving service quality and patient satisfaction. This study examines hospital complaints to enhance management practices by differentiating between surgery-related and non-surgery-related grievances. By identifying patterns in complaint types and outcomes, we aim to inform targeted quality improvement strategies that address specific patient concerns and boost operational efficiency. Methods: The study utilized data from an internal complaint management system over one year. Complaints were categorized as either surgery-related or non-surgery-related. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulation analysis were employed to examine the data. The sample comprised 132 complaints, with 67 being surgery-related and 65 non-surgery-related. Results: The analysis revealed that surgery-related complaints frequently involved issues with 'Patient Communication' and 'Surgical Error', while non-surgery-related complaints were primarily about the 'Medical Treatment Process'. The Surgery Department received the highest number of complaints, indicating a critical area for intervention. Additionally, the correlation between complaint types and outcomes provided insights into potential areas for improvement. Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for targeted communication training and procedural enhancements in surgical departments. Non-surgical departments should focus on improving treatment protocols and transparency. These strategies can reduce complaints and improve patient satisfaction. Future research should develop and test interventions based on these insights to further enhance healthcare quality.