Comparative Effectiveness of Therapies in 2665 Elderly Patients with Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

The optimal treatment strategy for elderly patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains controversial. We evaluated a national, multihospital database to compare the outcomes of aggressive treatment and medical management for those patients.

We performed a retrospective analysis of 2665 elderly patients with ruptured IAs admitted to 11 hospitals in China. Patients were divided into three age groups (60-69, 70-79, and 80 years or older). Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio for favorable and unfavorable outcomes.

Patients between 60 and 69 years old undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) had significantly decreased morbidity (13.7% versus 19.7% and 29.9%), compared to those who underwent clipping and medical management, similar mortality to patients who underwent clipping (3.6% versus 2.6%), and decreased mortality (3.6% versus 8.7%) to patients who underwent medical management. Coiled patients 70 to 79 years old had lower morbidity (21.3% versus 33.8%) and mortality (2.8% versus 11.3%) compared to patients who underwent medical management and similar mortality (21.3% versus 27.2%) and mortality (2.8% versus 4.8%) to patients who underwent clipping. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that factors associated with discharge status were age, poor mFisher grade, poor WFNS grade, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, aneurysms 4 mm or larger, and middle cerebral artery aneurysms.

Elderly patients treated with EVT had significantly less morbidity and mortality than those treated with clipping and medical management. A comprehensive assessment of the general state of elderly patients and IAs characteristic may help us to predict patients' prognosis.