Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025
Experimental Strategies to Bridge Large Tissue Gaps in the Injured Spinal Cord after Acute and Chronic Lesion
Published on: April 5, 2016
Both Type I Bovine Collagen Conduits and Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa Conduits Result in Functional Sensory
Tyler Jacobs1, Disha Patil2, Vincent B Ziccardi3
1Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ.
Purpose:
The study purpose was to measure and compare the time to functional sensory recovery (FSR) and incidence of FSR by 6 and 12 months between type I bovine collagen conduits versus porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) conduits with primary neurorrhaphy for peripheral nerve injury repair.
Methods:
A systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were conducted. The predictor variable was the type of conduit-either bovine collagen or porcine SIS. The primary outcome variable was the number of months between surgery and the patient achieving FSR. The secondary outcome variable was the proportion of patients who achieved FSR that did so by 6 and 12 months. A log-rank test was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences observed in the overall time-to-FSR data and by 6 and 12 months.
Results:
We screened 67 publications of which 8 were included. The sample sizes were 137 and 96 patients for the bovine collagen and porcine SIS groups, respectively. The median time to FSR for the bovine collagen conduit group was 9 months (interquartile range: 6); the median time to FSR for the porcine SIS conduit group 6 months (interquartile range: 3 months) (P = .50). Of the patients who achieved FSR, 42% of patients with bovine collagen conduits and 64% of patients with porcine SIS conduits did so within 6 months (P < .01). Of the patients who achieved FSR, 94% of patients with bovine collagen conduits and 82% of patients with porcine SIS conduits did so within 12 months (P < .01).
Conclusion:
Although a significant difference was found in the incidence of FSR at 6 and 12 months, no significant difference was found in overall time to FSR, supporting the use of either conduit for peripheral nerve repair.
