Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation using deep learning, clinical models, and polygenic scores
Gilbert Jabbour1,2,3, Alexis Nolin-Lapalme1,2,3,4, Olivier Tastet1,3
1Montreal Heart Institute Research Centre, 5000 Belanger St, Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada.
Background And Aims:
Deep learning applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) is an emerging approach for predicting atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). This study introduces an ECG-AI model developed and tested at a tertiary cardiac centre, comparing its performance with clinical models and AF polygenic score (PGS).
Methods:
Electrocardiograms in sinus rhythm from the Montreal Heart Institute were analysed, excluding those from patients with pre-existing AF. The primary outcome was incident AF at 5 years. An ECG-AI model was developed by splitting patients into non-overlapping data sets: 70% for training, 10% for validation, and 20% for testing. The performance of ECG-AI, clinical models, and PGS was assessed in the test data set. The ECG-AI model was externally validated in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) hospital data set.
Results:
A total of 669 782 ECGs from 145 323 patients were included. Mean age was 61 ± 15 years, and 58% were male. The primary outcome was observed in 15% of patients, and the ECG-AI model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve of .78. In time-to-event analysis including the first ECG, ECG-AI inference of high risk identified 26% of the population with a 4.3-fold increased risk of incident AF (95% confidence interval: 4.02-4.57). In a subgroup analysis of 2301 patients, ECG-AI outperformed CHARGE-AF (AUC-ROC = .62) and PGS (AUC-ROC = .59). Adding PGS and CHARGE-AF to ECG-AI improved goodness of fit (likelihood ratio test P < .001), with minimal changes to the AUC-ROC (.76-.77). In the external validation cohort (mean age 59 ± 18 years, 47% male, median follow-up 1.1 year), ECG-AI model performance remained consistent (AUC-ROC = .77).
Conclusions:
ECG-AI provides an accurate tool to predict new-onset AF in a tertiary cardiac centre, surpassing clinical and PGS.
More Related Videos
09:17High-Resolution Endocardial and Epicardial Optical Mapping in a Sheep Model of Stretch-Induced Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 29, 2011
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020