Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction With or Without ST-Segment
Marta Cocco1, Gianluca Campo1, Vincenzo Guiducci2
1Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Insights
Complete revascularization in older myocardial infarction (MI) patients, including ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI), consistently reduced adverse outcomes compared to culprit-only revascularization.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Complete revascularization is proven effective for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Its effectiveness in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) requires further investigation.
- Older patients with multivessel disease present unique challenges in revascularization strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes of complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in elderly patients with STEMI and NSTEMI.
- To assess if complete revascularization offers consistent benefits across different MI types in older adults.
- To evaluate the impact of physiology-guided complete revascularization on major adverse cardiovascular events.
Main Methods:
- The FIRE trial randomized 1,445 elderly MI patients to culprit-only or physiology-guided complete revascularization.
- Patients were stratified by STEMI and NSTEMI presentation.
- The primary outcome was a composite of death, MI, stroke, or revascularization at 1 year; a key secondary outcome was cardiovascular death or MI at 1 year.
Main Results:
- Physiology-guided complete revascularization significantly reduced the primary outcome in the overall population.
- In STEMI patients, the primary outcome occurred in 21.1% (culprit-only) vs. 16.2% (complete).
- In NSTEMI patients, the primary outcome occurred in 20.9% (culprit-only) vs. 15.4% (complete), with no significant interaction between MI type and treatment effect.
Conclusions:
- Physiology-guided complete revascularization provides consistent benefits for elderly patients with MI, regardless of STEMI or NSTEMI presentation.
- This strategy is associated with reduced rates of death, MI, stroke, or revascularization at one year.
- The findings support complete revascularization as a beneficial approach across the MI spectrum in older adults.
Background:
The effectiveness of complete revascularization is well established in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but it is less investigated in those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
Objectives:
This study aimed to assess whether complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, was associated with consistent outcomes in older patients with STEMI and NSTEMI.
Methods:
In the FIRE (Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients with Multivessel Disease) trial, 1,445 older patients with myocardial infarction (MI) were randomized to culprit-only or physiology-guided complete revascularization, stratified by STEMI (n = 256 culprit-only vs n = 253 complete) and NSTEMI (n = 469 culprit-only vs n = 467 complete). The primary outcome comprised a composite of death, MI, stroke, or revascularization at 1 year. The key secondary outcome included a composite of cardiovascular death or MI at 1 year.
Results:
In the overall study population, physiology-guided complete revascularization reduced both primary and key secondary outcomes. The primary outcome occurred in 54 (21.1%) STEMI patients randomized to culprit-only vs 41 (16.2%) STEMI patients of the complete group (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.50-1.13) and in 98 (20.9%) NSTEMI patients randomized to culprit-only vs 72 (15.4%) NSTEMI patients of the complete group (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.53-0.97), with negative interaction testing (P for interaction, 0.846). Similarly, no signal of heterogeneity with respect to the initial clinical presentation was observed for the key secondary endpoint (P for interaction, 0.654).
Conclusions:
Physiology-guided complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, provided consistent benefit across the whole spectrum of patients with MI. (FIRE [Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients With Multivessel Disease]; NCT03772743).
More Related Videos
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
