Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Derived Myocardial Strain Assessment Using Feature Tracking
Published on: February 12, 2011
Arrhythmic Risk Stratification by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Nonischemic
Daniel J Hammersley1, Abbasin Zegard2, Emmanuel Androulakis3
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Brompton & Harefield Clinical Group, part of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Background:
Myocardial fibrosis (MF) forms part of the arrhythmic substrate for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).
Objectives:
This study sought to determine whether total myocardial fibrosis (TF) and gray zone fibrosis (GZF), assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, are better than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).
Methods:
Patients with NICM in a derivation cohort (n = 866) and a validation cohort (n = 848) underwent quantification of TF and GZF. The primary composite endpoint was sudden cardiac death or VAs (ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia).
Results:
The primary endpoint was met by 52 of 866 (6.0%) patients in the derivation cohort (median follow-up: 7.5 years; Q1-Q3: 5.2-9.3 years). In competing-risks analyses, MF on visual assessment (MFVA) predicted the primary endpoint (HR: 5.83; 95% CI: 3.15-10.8). Quantified MF measures permitted categorization into 3 risk groups: a TF of >0 g and ≤10 g was associated with an intermediate risk (HR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.99-8.16), and a TF of >10 g was associated with the highest risk (HR: 9.17; 95% CI: 4.64-18.1) compared to patients with no MFVA (lowest risk). Similar trends were observed in the validation cohort. Categorization into these 3 risk groups was achievable using TF or GZF in combination or in isolation. In contrast, LVEF of <35% was a poor predictor of the primary endpoint (validation cohort HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 0.99-4.01).
Conclusions:
MFVA is a strong predictor of sudden cardiac death and VAs in NICM. TF and GZF mass added incremental value to MFVA. In contrast, LVEF was a poor discriminator of arrhythmic risk.
More Related Videos
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy