Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

11:02
The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
21.9K
Using an automated tail movement sensor device to predict calving time in dairy cows
S G Umaña Sedó1, D L Renaud1, J Morrison1
1Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada.
JDS Communications
|September 2, 2024
Summary
An automated tail movement sensor device showed limited effectiveness in predicting calving time in dairy cows. High false positive rates and frequent device detachment issues may hinder its practical application on commercial farms.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Veterinary Medicine
- Agricultural Technology
Background:
- Predicting calving time in dairy cows is crucial for herd management and animal welfare.
- Automated sensor devices offer potential for real-time monitoring of physiological events like parturition.
- The Moocall device is designed to detect tail movements indicative of impending calving.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Moocall device for predicting calving time in dairy cows.
- To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and false positive rates of the device's alarms.
- To determine the practical applicability of the Moocall device in a commercial dairy farm setting.
Main Methods:
- Moocall (MC) devices were attached to the tails of 49 dairy cows 3 days before their expected calving date.
- Device alarms (1-hour and 2-hour high activity) were recorded, and calving onset was confirmed via video monitoring.
- Data from 36 cows were analyzed after excluding animals with device issues (e.g., detachment, swelling).
Main Results:
- The Moocall device detached from 42% of the cows.
- Sensitivity for predicting calving ranged from 5% to 72%, while specificity ranged from 50% to 93%, depending on the alarm interval.
- False positive rates varied significantly (6% to 50%), potentially impacting the device's utility.
Conclusions:
- The automated tail movement sensor device demonstrated variable accuracy in predicting calving time.
- High rates of device detachment and false positives challenge its reliable use in commercial dairy operations.
- Further improvements are needed to enhance the device's performance and applicability for calving prediction.

