Cardiologists' perspective on termination of pacemaker therapy-an anonymous survey among cardiologists in Germany

Irene Portig1, Elena Hofacker1, Philipp Sommer2

  • 1Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany.

Insights

Cardiologists are willing to withdraw pacemakers but hesitate when patients depend on them, fearing ethical and legal issues. Official guidelines are needed for pacemaker withdrawal decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • European consensus addresses implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation but lacks guidance on pacemaker withdrawal.
  • Patient requests for pacemaker therapy withdrawal are increasing, posing ethical and medical challenges for healthcare professionals.
  • This study addresses the gap in understanding physician attitudes towards pacemaker deactivation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the opinions, concerns, and attitudes of cardiologists regarding patient requests for pacemaker withdrawal.
  • To identify factors influencing cardiologists' decisions on pacemaker deactivation.

Main Methods:

  • An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to 288 German cardiology departments.
  • 247 completed questionnaires were returned, representing a 48% response rate.

Main Results:

  • The majority of responding cardiologists were experienced and regularly performed pacemaker check-ups.
  • Most cardiologists were willing to deactivate pacemakers upon patient request and had done so.
  • Willingness to withdraw pacemakers decreased in cases of pacemaker dependency due to concerns about patient symptoms, responsibility, and legal implications.

Conclusions:

  • Uncertainties persist among cardiologists regarding pacemaker withdrawal, particularly in dependent patients.
  • Official European cardiologic society statements are recommended to clarify ethical, legal, and practical aspects of pacemaker withdrawal.
Abstract