Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Studying the Impact of Maternal Dietary Deficiencies on Long-Term Offspring Health Outcomes
Published on: June 28, 2024
Dwelling proximity to wildfire and spina bifida risk in offspring
Jordan Rossi1, Ruofan Yao1, Arriel Alvarez2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Objective:
To evaluate the association between wildfire exposure in pregnancy and spina bifida risk.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study used the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Linked Birth File with hospital discharge data between 2007 and 2010. The Birth File data were merged with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection data of the same year. Spina bifida was identified by its corresponding ICD-9 code listed on the hospital discharge of the newborn. Wildfire exposure was determined based on the zip code of the woman's home address. Pregnancy was considered exposed to wildfire if the mother lived within 15 miles of a wildfire during the pregnancy or within 30 days prior to pregnancy.
Results:
There were 2,093,185 births and 659 cases of spina bifida between 2007 and 2010. The births were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression models and adjusted for potential confounders. Exposure to wildfire in the first trimester was associated with higher odds of spina bifida (aOR= 1.43 [1.11-1.84], p-value = 0.01). Wildfire exposure 30 days before the last menstrual period and during the second and third trimesters were not associated with higher spina bifida risk.
Conclusion:
Wildfire exposure has shown an increased risk of spina bifida during the early stages of pregnancy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Neurulation
Pedigree Analysis
Probability Laws
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Cancer Prevention
Some...

