Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain
Published on: May 10, 2012
Consistency and stability of individualized cortical functional networks parcellation at 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI
Minhua Yu1, Bo Rao1, Yayun Cao1
1Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Background:
Individualized cortical functional networks parcellation has been reported as highly reproducible at 3.0 T. However, in view of the complexity of cortical networks and the greatly increased sensitivity provided by ultra-high field 5.0 T MRI, the parcellation consistency between different magnetic fields is unclear.
Purpose:
To explore the consistency and stability of individualized cortical functional networks parcellation at 3.0 T and 5.0 T MRI based on spatial and functional connectivity analysis.
Materials And Methods:
Thirty healthy young participants were enrolled. Each subject underwent resting-state fMRI at both 3.0 T and 5.0 T in a random order in less than 48 h. The individualized cortical functional networks was parcellated for each subject using a previously proposed iteration algorithm. Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the spatial consistency of parcellated networks between 3.0 T and 5.0 T. Functional connectivity (FC) consistency was evaluated using the Euclidian distance and Graph-theory metrics.
Results:
A functional cortical atlas consisting of 18 networks was individually parcellated at 3.0 T and 5.0 T. The spatial consistency of these networks at 3.0 T and 5.0 T for the same subject was significantly higher than that of inter-individuals. The FC between the 18 networks acquired at 3.0 T and 5.0 T were highly consistent for the same subject. Positive cross-subject correlations in Graph-theory metrics were found between 3.0 T and 5.0 T.
Conclusion:
Individualized cortical functional networks at 3.0 T and 5.0 T showed consistent and stable parcellation results both spatially and functionally. The 5.0 T MR provides finer functional sub-network characteristics than that of 3.0 T.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).

