Ureteral Ligation During Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is the surgical standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer. Although uncommon, the procedure involves a potential risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures. We report on a unique case of iatrogenic ureteral injury during RALP that required subsequent robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for definitive repair. A 57-year-old male underwent RALP using the Da Vinci Xi system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). The procedure was unremarkable and a 20 French Foley catheter was placed with plans for removal after one week following a negative cystogram. On postoperative day two, his creatinine level elevated to 2.69 mg/dL from a baseline of 1.40 mg/dL, left-sided flank pain increased, and non-contrast CT imaging revealed moderate left proximal hydroureteronephrosis and no other abnormalities. Aside from mild nausea on postoperative day one, he had no other symptoms. An integrated stent was unable to be placed by urology at this time. Subsequently, a left percutaneous nephrostomy tube was placed under fluoroscopic guidance. After this intervention, the patient's symptoms improved and the decision was made not to proceed with operative re-exploration at this time to attempt identification of the obstruction. Three weeks later, the patient underwent cystoscopy with attempted left retrograde ureteropyelography and left ureteroscopy due to suspected distal obstruction. This revealed complete obstruction of the intramural portion of the ureter, presumed to be secondary to suture ligation at the time of the vesicourethral anastomosis. Seven weeks postoperatively, the patient underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic left ureteral reimplantation. Thereafter, the patient had a resolution of his left hydroureteronephrosis and acute kidney injury. This case describes an intravesical ureteral ligation during RALP. An iatrogenic intravesical ureteral ligation has far less guiding literature than a more common ureteral transection. Additionally, ureteral transection is often identified and managed intraoperatively, while the ureteral ligation presented in this case is far less likely to be apparent during surgery. Early identification will allow for rapid reoperation to manage the injury. We hypothesize that during the vesicourethral anastomosis, the left intramural ureter was ligated. Importantly, with the use of a 3-0 V-Loc stitch for the vesicourethral anastomosis, its barbed nature would not facilitate simple surgical removal. In conclusion, when performing RALP, the depth of the bladder-sided vesicourethral anastomotic stitch should be carefully considered to avoid a similar injury.