Capability of big data to capture threatened vertebrate diversity in protected areas
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Species distribution data from IUCN and GBIF show significant differences in representing threatened vertebrates in protected areas (PAs). Improving data accuracy is crucial for effective conservation strategies and unbiased PA assessments.
Area Of Science
- Conservation Biology
- Biodiversity Assessment
- Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in Ecology
Background
- Protected areas (PAs) are critical for mitigating the global biodiversity crisis.
- Accurate representation of threatened species within PAs is essential for effective conservation outcomes.
- Global species distribution databases, such as the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), are primary tools for assessing PA effectiveness.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate discrepancies and biases in IUCN and GBIF data regarding threatened vertebrate representation in PAs.
- To compare species richness (SR) estimates between IUCN and GBIF within PAs globally.
- To evaluate the accuracy of these databases against independent data sources.
Main Methods
- Global assessment of threatened vertebrate species richness (SR) in PAs using IUCN and GBIF data.
- Statistical comparison of SR estimates between the two databases.
- Validation of database estimates against independent data for a subset of PAs.
Main Results
- Substantial differences in SR estimates for threatened vertebrates in PAs were found between IUCN and GBIF (t = -62.35, p ≤ 0.001).
- IUCN data overestimated SR by an average of 575%, while GBIF data underestimated SR by an average of 63%, with regional and taxonomic variations.
- Discrepancies were significant when compared to independent assessments, highlighting data biases.
Conclusions
- Current global databases (IUCN, GBIF) exhibit significant biases and disparities in representing threatened vertebrates within protected areas.
- Conservation planning and PA effectiveness assessments require careful consideration of these data limitations.
- Enhancing data comprehensiveness and reducing biases in species distribution databases are urgently needed for robust conservation decision-making.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
Perforation and dissection often occur during the initial stages of...
Conservation biology is a scientific field that focuses on the preservation of biodiversity in order to protect ecosystems while meeting the needs of the human population. Humans require properly functioning ecosystems to maintain our supply of natural resources, including food, medicines, and building materials.
Ecosystems also perform critical services, such as purifying our air and water. A large body of evidence indicates that such ecosystem services depend on biodiversity. Furthermore,...
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
Conservation efforts often utilize scientific approaches to identify the reasons, or the agents, causing the population to decline. This approach then devises steps to remove, oppose, or neutralize the agents.
Conservation efforts may also introduce a test group to determine the probable cause of the decline. The...
Biodiversity describes the variety of living things at multiple organizational levels: genetic, species and ecosystem diversity. Species diversity includes all branches of the evolutionary tree from single-celled prokaryotic organisms, bacteria, and archaea, to the eukaryotic kingdoms: plants; animals; fungi; and protists. To date, there have been about 1.75 million species identified, and new species are discovered every week.
Biodiversity also includes the interactions that connect organisms...