Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

811
Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
811
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

564
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
564
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

124
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
124
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System01:29

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

5.6K
The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
5.6K
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I01:25

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I

2.0K
A model is a theoretical way to understand a concept or an idea. Models can overcome barriers to health regardless of diverse economic and cultural backgrounds. In addition, models make the task easier by providing different ways to approach complex issues. There are two major health promotion models: the health belief model and the health promotion model.
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
2.0K
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System01:18

Introduction To Health Care Delivery System

2.7K
The healthcare system is constantly changing and complex. Various services are available from different healthcare providers, but gaining access to these services has become challenging for people with limited healthcare insurance. Uninsured people present a challenge to healthcare because they frequently postpone or forego treatment.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ex ante evaluation of risk adjustment models for prospective provider payment: a conceptual framework and empirical application.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2025
Same author

Does Health-Based Prospective Risk Adjustment Adequately Compensate for Individuals Diagnosed With a New Chronic Disease?

Medical care research and review : MCRR·2025
Same author

Reliability of data-driven versus expert-driven composite indicators in between-hospital comparisons on quality of oesophagogastric cancer surgery: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Changes in spending, quality indicators, and provider experiences following the introduction of a population-based payment model in dutch primary care: a mixed methods evaluation.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2025
Same author

Case-mix adjustment for between-hospital comparisons in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2025
Same author

How Do Bundled Payment Initiatives Account for Differences in Patient Risk Profiles? A Systematic Review.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

A Framework for the Design of Risk-Adjustment Models in Health care Provider Payment Systems.

Andreea Panturu1, Richard van Kleef1, Frank Eijkenaar1

  • 1Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Medical Care Research and Review : MCRR
|September 3, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Designing adequate risk adjustment (RA) for healthcare provider payments requires balancing cost control and feasibility. This framework clarifies RA design choices and trade-offs for better payment systems.

Keywords:
alternative payment modelsfinancial incentivesprovider paymentsrisk adjustment

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Healthcare Policy
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Prospective payment systems necessitate robust risk adjustment (RA) to account for patient health variations.
  • Current RA designs involve complex trade-offs between risk selection, cost containment, and implementation feasibility.
  • A comprehensive framework detailing these RA design choices and their implications is currently lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a comprehensive framework for understanding risk adjustment design choices in healthcare provider payment.
  • To categorize key design decisions related to risk adjusters and payment weights.
  • To elucidate the trade-offs associated with each design choice for tailored RA implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review to identify critical design choices in RA for provider payment.
  • Expert consultation to refine understanding of RA design options and trade-offs.
  • Categorization of design choices along two primary dimensions: risk adjusters and payment weights.

Main Results:

  • Identification of key design choices for risk adjustment in provider payment systems.
  • Categorization of these choices based on risk adjusters and payment weights.
  • Detailed overview of options, trade-offs, and relevant references for each design choice.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework makes RA design choices and their associated trade-offs explicit.
  • Facilitates customization of RA design to specific provider payment systems and objectives.
  • Aims to improve the fairness and efficiency of healthcare provider reimbursement through better risk adjustment.