Impact of Skin Care Products on Phthalates and Phthalate Replacements in Children: the ECHO-FGS

Michael S Bloom1, Juliana M Clark1, John L Pearce2

  • 1Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.

PubMed

Insights

Children

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health and Toxicology
  • Pediatric Epidemiology and exposure to urinary phthalate metabolites
  • Analytical Chemistry and Public Health Policy

Background:

Phthalates and their chemical replacements pose significant risks to pediatric health during sensitive developmental windows. Prior research has shown that early-life exposure to these endocrine-disrupting compounds correlates with adverse neurodevelopmental and metabolic outcomes. Children frequently encounter these substances through various environmental pathways, including dietary intake and household dust. Dermal absorption represents another potential route, particularly through the frequent application of topical formulations designed for hygiene or protection. While adult exposure patterns are well-documented, the specific contribution of pediatric hygiene routines to internal chemical burdens remains poorly characterized. This absence of evidence motivated the current investigation into how common topical applications influence systemic levels of these industrial additives.

Purpose Of The Study:

This investigation evaluates the relationship between recent application of topical hygiene items and the concentration of chemical markers in pediatric urine. Researchers sought to quantify how specific categories of personal care items contribute to the internal dose of plasticizers and their substitutes. The team aimed to identify whether certain demographic factors or usage patterns alter these chemical associations within a diverse cohort. Establishing these links provides a clearer understanding of non-dietary exposure routes that parents and clinicians can potentially mitigate. The work also explores how complex combinations of multiple products create distinct exposure profiles among young participants. By analyzing these interactions, the study provides data necessary for refining safety guidelines regarding pediatric consumer goods. This research serves to bridge the gap between consumer behavior and biological toxicant levels in early childhood.

Main Methods:

Investigators recruited children aged four to eight years from the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes-Fetal Growth Study (ECHO-FGS) cohort. Mothers provided detailed information regarding the use of various topical items during the twenty-four hours preceding biological sample collection. The laboratory team utilized Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to measure sixteen distinct chemical markers in spot urine samples. Statistical analysis involved linear regression models adjusted for urinary specific gravity, age, biological sex, and Body Mass Index (BMI). The researchers also accounted for maternal education levels and the specific season when the specimens were gathered. Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) were implemented to categorize participants into specific clusters based on their multi-product usage behaviors. The analysis specifically targeted sixteen distinct metabolites to provide a comprehensive overview of both traditional plasticizers and their modern chemical substitutes.

Main Results:

Application of oils was associated with a 2.86-fold increase in Monoethyl Phthalate (MEP) concentrations compared to non-users. Lotion use occurred in forty-three percent of the participants and linked to a 1.17-fold higher level of Mono-Benzyl Phthalate (MBzP) compared to non-users. Those receiving these lipid-based treatments also exhibited a 1.43-fold elevation in Monobutyl Phthalate (MBP) and a 1.40-fold increase in Low-Molecular-Weight (LMW) phthalates relative to untreated children. Conversely, the application of combined hair-care formulations correlated with lower levels of Mono(3-carboxypropyl) Phthalate (MCPP) and MBP than those seen in non-users. Racial and ethnic identity functioned as a significant modifier for associations involving sunscreens, ointments, and hair conditioners. The computational clustering identified four distinct usage scenarios that predicted significant elevations in Diethylhexyl Phthalate (DEHP) and other replacement metabolites. These results demonstrate that even infrequent product use can lead to substantial changes in internal chemical concentrations across diverse pediatric populations.

Conclusions:

Frequent application of specific topical formulations significantly contributes to the systemic burden of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in young children. These findings highlight the importance of considering dermal absorption as a primary exposure pathway for developmental toxicants. Public health officials can use this data to develop more stringent regulations for ingredients in consumer goods designed for young populations. Clinicians should consider discussing the selection of personal care items with parents to minimize unnecessary chemical contact. Future research must investigate the long-term health consequences of these specific exposure profiles identified through computational modeling. Reducing the use of high-impact items like oils and certain lotions may offer a practical strategy for lowering internal phthalate levels. This study underscores the need for transparent labeling and safer alternatives in the pediatric skincare market to ensure child safety.

Abstract

Frequently Asked Questions