Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

04:45
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
3.7K
Rethinking Surgical Margins: A New Approach to Predict Outcomes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Dean Dudkiewicz1,2, Eyal Yosefof1,2, Thomas Shpitzer1,2
1Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel.
The Laryngoscope
|September 4, 2024
Summary
The traditional 5mm cutoff for surgical margins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is debated. Treating margin distance as a continuum significantly improves survival prediction and locoregional control assessment in OCSCC patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Pathology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- The established 5mm cutoff for evaluating surgical margins in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) lacks definitive prognostic value.
- Current methods for assessing surgical margins in OCSCC are controversial, necessitating a re-evaluation of their predictive accuracy.
- Understanding the prognostic implications of surgical margin status is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and patient outcomes in OCSCC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether surgical margin distance in OCSCC can be better predicted using a continuous variable approach rather than a fixed cutoff.
- To determine if treating surgical margins as a continuum enhances the predictive value for survival and locoregional control in OCSCC.
- To develop a more accurate predictive model for OCSCC patient outcomes by analyzing margin distance as a continuous spectrum.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 266 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) patients treated between 1995 and 2020.
- Evaluation of clinical, pathological, and surgical data, including margin distance, using regression analyses to assess impact on survivability.
- Comparison of predictive accuracy between categorical (5mm cutoff) and continuous margin assessments, with multivariate analysis to control for confounders.
Main Results:
- Stratification by the traditional categorical margin status (5mm cutoff) showed no significant difference in patient survival (p=0.54).
- Re-evaluating margin distance as a continuous variable yielded statistically significant improvements in predicting survival outcomes (p=0.0018).
- Continuous margin assessment also demonstrated a trend towards improved prediction of locoregional control (p=0.06) compared to categorical analysis (p=0.59).
Conclusions:
- The continuum spectrum of surgical margin distance provides a more accurate prediction of survival outcomes in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).
- Treating surgical margin distance as a continuous variable significantly enhances the assessment of locoregional control in OCSCC.
- This study supports a shift from categorical to continuous analysis of surgical margins for improved prognostic accuracy in OCSCC management.

