Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Brain Infarct Segmentation and Registration on MRI or CT for Lesion-symptom Mapping
Published on: September 25, 2019
Boundary-based registration improves sensitivity for detecting hypoperfusion in sporadic frontotemporal lobar
Sylvia Mihailescu1, Quinn Hlava2, Philip A Cook3
1School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Introduction:
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is associated with FTLD due to tau (FTLD-tau) or TDP (FTLD-TDP) inclusions found at autopsy. Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI is often acquired in the same session as a structural T1-weighted image (T1w), enabling detection of regional changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF). We hypothesize that ASL-T1w registration with more degrees of freedom using boundary-based registration (BBR) will better align ASL and T1w images and show increased sensitivity to regional hypoperfusion differences compared to manual registration in patient participants. We hypothesize that hypoperfusion will be associated with a clinical measure of disease severity, the FTLD-modified clinical dementia rating scale sum-of-boxes (FTLD-CDR).
Materials And Methods:
Patients with sporadic likely FTLD-tau (sFTLD-tau; N = 21), with sporadic likely FTLD-TDP (sFTLD-TDP; N = 14), and controls (N = 50) were recruited from the Connectomic Imaging in Familial and Sporadic Frontotemporal Degeneration project (FTDHCP). Pearson's Correlation Coefficients (CC) were calculated on cortical vertex-wise CBF between each participant for each of 3 registration methods: (1) manual registration, (2) BBR initialized with manual registration (manual+BBR), (3) and BBR initialized using FLIRT (FLIRT+BBR). Mean CBF was calculated in the same regions of interest (ROIs) for each registration method after image alignment. Paired t-tests of CC values for each registration method were performed to compare alignment. Mean CBF in each ROI was compared between groups using t-tests. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 (Bonferroni-corrected). We performed linear regression to relate FTLD-CDR to mean CBF in patients with sFTLD-tau and sFTLD-TDP, separately (p < 0.05, uncorrected).
Results:
All registration methods demonstrated significant hypoperfusion in frontal and temporal regions in each patient group relative to controls. All registration methods detected hypoperfusion in the left insular cortex, middle temporal gyrus, and temporal pole in sFTLD-TDP relative to sFTLD-tau. FTLD-CDR had an inverse association with CBF in right temporal and orbitofrontal ROIs in sFTLD-TDP. Manual+BBR performed similarly to FLIRT+BBR.
Discussion:
ASL is sensitive to distinct regions of hypoperfusion in patient participants relative to controls, and in patients with sFTLD-TDP relative to sFTLD-tau, and decreasing perfusion is associated with increasing disease severity, at least in sFTLD-TDP. BBR can register ASL-T1w images adequately for controls and patients.
Insights
Boundary-based registration (BBR) improves Arterial Spin Labeling MRI sensitivity for detecting hypoperfusion in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). This method reveals disease-specific patterns and links reduced cerebral blood flow to clinical severity in FTLD-TDP.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Neurology
- Radiology
Background:
- Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is characterized by tau (FTLD-tau) or TDP (FTLD-TDP) inclusions.
- Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) MRI detects regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes, often acquired with T1-weighted (T1w) images.
- Accurate registration of ASL and T1w images is crucial for detecting subtle hypoperfusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if boundary-based registration (BBR) with more degrees of freedom enhances ASL-T1w image alignment compared to manual registration.
- To assess if improved registration increases sensitivity to regional hypoperfusion differences in FTLD patients.
- To investigate the association between hypoperfusion and FTLD-clinical dementia rating scale sum-of-boxes (FTLD-CDR) scores.
Main Methods:
- Recruited patients with sporadic FTLD-tau (sFTLD-tau; N=21), sFTLD-TDP (N=14), and controls (N=50).
- Compared three ASL-T1w registration methods: manual, manual+BBR, and FLIRT+BBR, assessing alignment via Pearson's Correlation Coefficients (CC).
- Analyzed mean CBF in regions of interest (ROIs) and used linear regression to correlate CBF with FTLD-CDR.
Main Results:
- All registration methods showed significant hypoperfusion in frontal and temporal regions in both FTLD groups compared to controls.
- Hypoperfusion in the left insular cortex, middle temporal gyrus, and temporal pole was detected in sFTLD-TDP relative to sFTLD-tau.
- FTLD-CDR inversely correlated with CBF in right temporal and orbitofrontal ROIs in sFTLD-TDP; manual+BBR and FLIRT+BBR performed similarly.
Conclusions:
- ASL MRI, particularly with BBR registration, is sensitive to distinct hypoperfusion patterns in FTLD subtypes.
- Decreased cerebral blood flow is associated with increased disease severity in sFTLD-TDP.
- BBR provides adequate registration of ASL-T1w images for both controls and FTLD patients.

