Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System01:26

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

3.2K
At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
3.2K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

87
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
87
Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences01:19

Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences

367
Biostatistics involves the application of statistical techniques to scientific research in health-related fields, including biology and public health. These techniques are essential for designing studies, collecting data, and analyzing it to draw meaningful conclusions. Given the complexity of biological processes, particularly in studies involving human subjects, biostatistical methods are crucial for effectively organizing and interpreting data that might otherwise obscure underlying patterns...
367
Primary Healthcare Services01:30

Primary Healthcare Services

1.3K
Primary care promotes wellness and prevents disease. This care includes health promotion, education, protection (such as immunizations), early disease screening, and environmental considerations. Settings providing this type of healthcare include physician offices, public health clinics, school nursing, and community health nursing.
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
1.3K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

2.1K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
2.1K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

124
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
124

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'You only care when it hurts' - men's engagement with their health: a qualitative interview study in Lower Austria.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Correction: Evaluating the implementation of integrated knowledge translation in a multi-country research consortium in Sub-Saharan Africa - a mixed methods comparative case study.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same author

[Evaluation of a Model Project for the Medical Care of People without Health Insurance in Bremen].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2026
Same author

Intersectional inequalities in self-rated health in Germany across sex/gender, migration, education and income: a cross-sectional study.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
Same author

Cochrane Evaluation of (Semi-) Automated Review Methods (CESAR): Protocol for an adaptive platform study within reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

How do people with multiple sclerosis who have walking difficulties perceive participation? A qualitative analysis.

Clinical rehabilitation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K

A Structured Approach to Involve Stakeholders in Prioritising Topics for Systematic Reviews in Public Health.

Dyon Hoekstra1,2,3, Margot Mütsch4, Annegret Borchard4,5

  • 1Research Group for Evidence-Based Public Health, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology (BIPS), Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research (IPP), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

International Journal of Public Health
|September 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a PICO-formatted approach for prioritizing public health systematic reviews, involving stakeholders to identify key research topics and highlight disparities in preferences.

Keywords:
Delphi techniquepriority settingpublic healthstakeholder involvementsystematic review

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.7K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Services Research
  • Systematic Review Methodology

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are crucial for evidence-based public health.
  • Prioritizing topics for systematic reviews can be challenging and requires stakeholder input.
  • Existing prioritization methods may not fully integrate stakeholder preferences transparently.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a structured, PICO-formatted approach for prioritizing public health systematic review topics.
  • To transparently incorporate stakeholder preferences into the topic prioritization process.
  • To assess the utility of the developed approach in identifying high-priority review topics.

Main Methods:

  • A multi-stage process involving scoping, two Delphi rounds with web-based surveys, and content analysis.
  • Public health stakeholders in Switzerland were invited to participate.
  • Topics were reformulated into the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and rated using five criteria.

Main Results:

  • 215 respondents suggested 728 topics; Delphi response rates were high (91.6% and 77.6%).
  • Top-rated topics focused on the effectiveness of educational interventions and improving access to healthcare services.
  • The study identified differences in topic ratings between stakeholder groups and assessment criteria.

Conclusions:

  • The developed approach effectively engages stakeholders in prioritizing systematic review topics.
  • The method highlights disparities in priorities among different stakeholder groups and criteria.
  • This structured approach enhances transparency and relevance in public health research prioritization.