Re-evaluating the Morse Fall Scale in obstetrics and gynecology wards and determining optimal cut-off scores for

Bijun Mao1, Huiping Jiang1, Yan Chen1

  • 1Nursing Department, Huzhou Maternity & Child Health Care Hospital, Huzhou, China.

Plos One
|September 5, 2024
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

The Morse Fall Scale effectively predicts fall risk in obstetrics and gynecology wards. An optimal cut-off score of 40 demonstrates good predictive performance for patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Sciences
  • Nursing Research
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Falls in healthcare settings pose significant risks, particularly in obstetrics and gynecology wards.
  • Accurate fall risk assessment tools are crucial for implementing timely preventive measures.
  • The Morse Fall Scale (MFS) is widely used but requires validation in specific patient populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of the Morse Fall Scale (MFS) in obstetrics and gynecology settings.
  • To determine the optimal cut-off score of the MFS for predicting fall risk in these wards.
  • To analyze the predictive performance of the MFS using electronic medical records.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective survey design was employed.
  • Data were collected from 136 fall inpatients and 120 no-fall inpatients across two hospitals.
  • The Morse Fall Scale's performance was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Main Results:

  • The area under the ROC curve ranged from 0.749 to 0.772 across different cut-off scores.
  • At a cut-off score of 40, the MFS demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.735 and a specificity of 0.808.
  • The optimal cut-off score of 40 yielded the highest Youden index and good overall predictive accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The Morse Fall Scale (MFS) exhibits good predictive performance for fall risk assessment in obstetrics and gynecology wards.
  • A cut-off score of 40 is identified as optimal for enhancing the scale's utility in these clinical settings.
  • These findings support the use of the MFS with a cut-off of 40 for improved patient safety.