Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks
Published on: December 2, 2015
World Federation of Neurology Needs Registry Survey 2021
William M Carroll1, Wolfgang Grisold2
1World Federation of Neurology, Chester House, 83 Fulham High St, London SW6 3JA, London, UK; Department of Neurology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Perth, Western Australia, 6009, University of Western Australia, Centre for Neuromuscular and Neurological Disorders Perron Institute, 8 Verdun St. Nedlands WA, 6009, Australia.
Abstract:
The WFN Needs Registry survey was developed and conducted over two and a half years commencing in 2020 to investigate the accessibility and affordability of neurological services and therapeutics and the most urgent needs.
Method:
An experienced neurologist responded in each of 118 societies to an online electronic survey comprising 13 questions. General data sought comprised the respondent's training, place of practice, duration in practice, number of neurologists in the society, health care system and types of neurological practice available. Specific data collected comprised neurological facilities, specialist services available, resources, therapeutics accessibility, challenges and three most urgent needs.
Results:
Responding neurologists spent a median of 26 years in practice and represented a median of 225 neurologists per society. Of 13 classes of neuromedicines deemed readily available to 70% of the population, 41 societies listed ≥1 and 14 societies ≥3 unavailable. The three most frequent unavailable neuromedicines were second level AEDs, Dopamine agonists and MS DMTs. Of 14 neurological services, 15 societies had all services accessible and affordable, 13 had none and 72 had ≥1 services either inaccessible or unaffordable. EEG, Epilepsy, Headache and EMG services were most available; Neurogenetics, Neuropsychology, Neurorehabilitation and Neurodevelopmental services were least available. Of 13 specified challenges, lack of subspecialists and specialty centers were both identified by 61% of societies followed by costs of neurological care, neuromedicines availability and stigma. Ten societies had no challenges.
Conclusion:
A unique insight into the inequities of neurological care globally and a potential tool to assist their remedy.
More Related Videos
04:43Author Spotlight: Advancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Patients with Right Hemisphere Damage Using Assisted Active Exercise
Published on: February 9, 2024
10:45The Mouse Stroke Unit Protocol with Standardized Neurological Scoring for Translational Mouse Stroke Studies
Published on: February 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Neural Regulation