Myo-regressor Deep Informed Neural NetwOrk (Myo-DINO) for fast MR parameters mapping in neuromuscular disorders
Leonardo Barzaghi1, Francesca Brero2, Raffaella Fiamma Cabini3
1Department of Mathematics, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 5, 27100 Pavia, Italy; Advanced Imaging and Artificial Intelligence Center, Department of Neuroradiology, IRCCS Mondino, Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy; INFN, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Pavia Unit, Via Bassi 6, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
We developed Myo-DINO, a novel deep learning model for efficient and explainable muscle MRI parameter mapping in Neuromuscular Disorders. This Physics-Informed Neural Network offers a robust alternative to traditional methods, improving diagnostic capabilities.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
- Biophysics
Background:
- Muscle Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mMRI) parameter mapping traditionally uses computationally intensive pattern recognition algorithms.
- Existing deep learning (DL) models for MR parameter mapping lack interpretability and haven't been applied to mMRI for Neuromuscular Disorders (NMDs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an efficient and explainable DL model, Myo-DINO (Myo-Regressor Deep Informed Neural NetwOrk), for mapping Fat Fraction (FF), water-T2 (wT2), and B1 parameters in NMDs.
- To integrate physics-based constraints into a DL framework to enhance model interpretability and performance.
Main Methods:
- A Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) with a U-Net architecture (Myo-DINO) was developed using 2165 MESE slices from 232 NMD subjects.
- Two physics-informed loss functions were implemented: Cycling Loss 1 (mono-exponential model) and Cycling Loss 2 (Extended Phase Graph (EPG) theory with slice profile).
- Myo-DINO was trained with varying weights for the L2 norm and physics-informed components, including a self-supervised approach.
Main Results:
- Myo-DINO achieved superior performance with Cycling Loss 2, demonstrating high reconstruction similarity (SSIM > 0.92, PSNR > 30.0 dB) and low error (NRMSE < 0.038) compared to reference maps.
- Muscle-wise FF, wT2, and B1 predictions showed good agreement with reference values.
- The self-supervised constraint with Cycling Loss 2 improved explainability by ensuring the network learned according to EPG model assumptions.
Conclusions:
- Myo-DINO provides a robust and efficient workflow for mMRI parameter mapping in NMDs, serving as a viable alternative to existing post-processing algorithms.
- The Extended Phase Graph (EPG) model incorporated in Cycling Loss 2 offers the most effective physical constraints for this multi-parameter regression task.
- Physics-informed DL, particularly with EPG constraints and self-supervision, enhances both the efficiency and interpretability of MR parameter mapping in NMD research.
More Related Videos
06:35In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurement of Compound Muscle Action Potential from the Forelimbs in Mouse Models of Motor Neuron Degeneration
Published on: June 15, 2018
11:07Engineering and Characterization of an Optogenetic Model of the Human Neuromuscular Junction
Published on: April 14, 2022
