Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...

Variability: Analysis

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

Prediction Intervals

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Typability Index: A tool for measuring and controlling for typing difficulty in text stimuli.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

Understanding <i>p</i>-values and significance.

Laboratory animals·2024

Same author

Enhancing clinical genomic accuracy with panelGC: a novel metric and tool for quantifying and monitoring GC biases in hybridization capture panel sequencing.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2024

Same author

Evaluating Stacked Methylation Markers for Blood-Based Multicancer Detection.

Cancers·2023

Same author

Reply to 'It is time for an empirically informed paradigm shift in animal research'.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2020

Same author

Author Correction: Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2020

Same journal

Standardized surgical access to the porcine temporomandibular joint: Anatomical basis for translational research.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

Development of animal use in experiments: a brief historical overview.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

The reduction potential of diet board feeding-survival and clinical chemistry of group-housed Sprague Dawley rats in a 24-month study.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

Advancing the 3Rs? Researchers' perspectives on institutional facilitation in Switzerland - Part 2: executive facilitation.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

Recognition of pain and distress.

Laboratory animals·2026

Same journal

Strengthening animal welfare: monitoring humane endpoints in a rat model of mammary tumorigenesis undergoing a ladder resistance training protocol.

Laboratory animals·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Depicting variability and uncertainty using intervals and error bars.

Naomi Altman¹, Martin Krzywinski²

¹Department of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, USA.

Laboratory Animals

|September 6, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Biological systems exhibit inherent variability. This article clarifies the distinct concepts of sample variation and estimation error, often confused due to similar interval notation in scientific studies.

Keywords:

Statistics techniques

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Biological variability
Statistical analysis in life sciences

Background:

Biological systems display inherent variability due to population differences.
Studies often encounter two types of variation: differences among samples and estimation error.
These distinct concepts are frequently represented using similar interval notation.

Purpose of the Study:

To differentiate between sample variation and estimation error.
To explain the appropriate and inappropriate uses of interval notation in biological studies.
To enhance clarity in the interpretation of scientific data.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of statistical variation in biological contexts.
Review of common interval notations used in scientific literature.
Discussion of potential misinterpretations of variation metrics.

Main Results:

Sample variation reflects differences within a population.
Estimation error quantifies uncertainty in population parameter estimates.
Misuse of interval notation can lead to flawed data interpretation.

Conclusions:

Clear distinction between sample variation and estimation error is crucial.
Correctly interpreting interval notation improves scientific rigor.
Understanding these concepts prevents common statistical errors in biological research.