Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025
Discovery of Driver Genes in Colorectal HT29-derived Cancer Stem-Like Tumorspheres
Published on: July 22, 2020
Characterization of Expression-Based Gene Clusters Gives Insights into Variation in Patient Response to Cancer
1School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Background:
Transcriptomics can reveal much about cellular activity, and cancer transcriptomics have been useful in investigating tumor cell behaviors. Patterns in transcriptome-wide gene expression can be used to investigate biological mechanisms and pathways that can explain the variability in patient response to cancer therapies.
Methods:
We identified gene expression patterns related to patient drug response by clustering tumor gene expression data and selecting from the resulting gene clusters those where expression of cluster genes was related to patient survival on specific drugs. We then investigated these gene clusters for biological meaning using several approaches, including identifying common genomic locations and transcription factors whose targets were enriched in these clusters and performing survival analyses to support these candidate transcription factor-drug relationships.
Results:
We identified gene clusters related to drug-specific survival, and through these, we were able to associate observed variations in patient drug response to specific known biological phenomena. Specifically, our analysis implicated 2 stem cell-related transcription factors, HOXB4 and SALL4, in poor response to temozolomide in brain cancers. In addition, expression of SNRNP70 and its targets were implicated in cetuximab response by 3 different analyses, although the mechanism remains unclear. We also found evidence that 2 cancer-related chromosomal structural changes may impact drug efficacy.
Conclusion:
In this study, we present the gene clusters identified and the results of our systematic analysis linking drug efficacy to specific transcription factors, which are rich sources of potential mechanistic relationships impacting patient outcomes. We also highlight the most promising of these results, which were supported by multiple analyses and by previous research. We report these findings as promising avenues for independent validation and further research into cancer treatments and patient response.
