Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Respiratory health impacts of coal-fired power plant emissions with transboundary environmental complexities.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Toxic Substances in Plastics, Micro- and Nanoplastics: Utilizing ATSDR's Plastics-Related Toxicological Profile Tool and Mixtures Framework for Human Health Risk Assessment.

Toxics·2026

Same author

Catalytic, antibacterial and thermal characteristics of VO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles derived from dextrose.

Discover nano·2026

Same author

Environmental Substances Associated with Neurodegeneration: An Overview of Parkinson's Disease and Related Genotoxic Endpoints.

Genes·2026

Same author

In Silico Hazard Assessment of Ototoxicants Through Machine Learning and Computational Systems Biology.

Toxics·2026

Same author

Occurrence and Health Risk of Multiclass Pesticide Residues in Tomatoes From Bangladesh via Modified QuEChERS-LC-MS/MS.

Biomedical chromatography : BMC·2025

Same journal

Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms and Health: Awareness, Behaviors, Perceptions, and Communication Preferences Among U.S. Adults.

Journal of environmental health·2026

Same journal

Navigating Community-Engaged Research to Understand How Drought Affects Water Quality.

Journal of environmental health·2026

Same journal

PFAS Information for Clinicians From ATSDR.

Journal of environmental health·2025

Same journal

Church Jetted Baptismal Font Linked to Legionellosis Outbreak-Tennessee, 2023.

Journal of environmental health·2025

Same journal

Building Capacity Nationwide for Environmental Health and Protecting Communities from Harmful Chemical Exposures.

Journal of environmental health·2025

Same journal

Development, Evaluation, and Long-Term Outcomes of Environmental Health and Land Reuse Training-Part 1: Developing Environmental Health and Land Reuse Trainings for the Environmental Health Workforce and Their Community Partners.

Journal of environmental health·2024

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

Profiling Metal-Induced Genotoxic Endpoints.

Mohammad Shoeb¹, Gregory M Zarus¹, Henry E Abadin¹

¹Office of Innovation and Analytics, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Journal of Environmental Health

|September 6, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Toxic metals like chromium and arsenic can cause DNA damage, leading to genetic alterations. This review summarizes evidence linking metal exposure to genotoxicity and epigenetic changes.

More Related Videos

Quantification of three DNA Lesions by Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of Their Levels in Tissues of Mice Exposed to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter

Quantification of three DNA Lesions by Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of Their Levels in Tissues of Mice Exposed to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter

Published on: May 29, 2019

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

Quantification of three DNA Lesions by Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of Their Levels in Tissues of Mice Exposed to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter

Quantification of three DNA Lesions by Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of Their Levels in Tissues of Mice Exposed to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter

Published on: May 29, 2019

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

Area of Science:

Environmental Toxicology
Genetics
Epigenetics

Background:

Toxic metals are implicated in DNA damage initiation and progression.
Metal exposure can activate DNA damage response pathways.
Genotoxic endpoints and epigenetic modifications are influenced by metal exposure.

Purpose of the Study:

To systematically review evidence on metal-induced genotoxicity.
To summarize findings from Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) profiles and literature.
To explore the link between metal exposure and DNA alterations.

Main Methods:

Systematic literature review.
Analysis of ATSDR toxicological profiles.
Inclusion of studies on specific metals: chromium, arsenic, nickel, lead, mercury, and zinc.

Main Results:

Accumulating evidence suggests a link between metal exposure and genotoxic endpoints.
Metal exposure can induce global and gene-specific DNA alterations.
Epigenetic modifications are also influenced by toxic metal exposure.

Conclusions:

Toxic metals contribute to DNA damage and genotoxicity.
Further research is warranted to fully understand metal-induced genetic and epigenetic effects.
Public health awareness regarding metal exposure risks is crucial.