Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

1.4K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

922
The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
922
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

124
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
124
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

225.3K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
225.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist use and risk of arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: retrospective database analysis.

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine·2026
Same author

Response to Letter to the Editor titled "Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for persistent pain after knee arthroplasty: What is the challenge?"

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)·2026
Same author

The Safety and Effectiveness of Lumbar Transforaminal Injection of Sterile Amniotic Fluid Filtrate Compared to Steroid for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Due to Spinal Stenosis: A Phase I/II Double-Blinded Randomized Trial.

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Evaluating prognostic block selection criteria in lumbar medical branch radiofrequency neurotomy: A retrospective cohort study.

Interventional pain medicine·2026
Same author

Climate change and health through the lens of physical medicine and rehabilitation: A scoping review.

The journal of climate change and health·2026
Same author

Re: "Intellectual conflicts of interest in spinal cord stimulation research - The gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical expertise".

Interventional pain medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
07:28

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

Published on: December 19, 2016

20.9K

Systematic reviews: Not always a pain.

Alexandra E Fogarty1, Aaron Conger2, Taylor Burnham2

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Interventional Pain Medicine
|September 6, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article details systematic review development, crucial for understanding treatment interventions. Following these methods enhances primary research and improves evidence-based clinical decisions.

Keywords:
Interventional painMethodologySystematic review

More Related Videos

Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
09:38

Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery

Published on: April 14, 2016

12.6K
Manual Therapy for a Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Rat Model
07:34

Manual Therapy for a Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Rat Model

Published on: August 11, 2023

677

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
07:28

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

Published on: December 19, 2016

20.9K
Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
09:38

Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery

Published on: April 14, 2016

12.6K
Manual Therapy for a Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Rat Model
07:34

Manual Therapy for a Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain Rat Model

Published on: August 11, 2023

677

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Clinical Trial Analysis

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are vital for evaluating evidence on specific interventions within populations.
  • High-quality systematic reviews inform clinicians and policymakers about treatment effectiveness.
  • Understanding review methodology enhances primary research quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the fundamental principles of systematic review development.
  • To address common challenges and specific considerations in interventional pain medicine.
  • To improve the value of systematic reviews through better primary research.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review development involves team assembly, question definition, protocol publication, and rigorous search strategies.
  • Key steps include study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and data synthesis.
  • Certainty assessment and addressing pitfalls are crucial for robust reviews.

Main Results:

  • A structured approach to systematic reviews ensures comprehensive evidence evaluation.
  • Methodological rigor in reviews leads to more reliable conclusions on interventions.
  • Improved primary research directly enhances the quality and utility of systematic reviews.

Conclusions:

  • Adherence to systematic review principles is essential for accurate intervention assessment.
  • Investigator understanding of review methodology can elevate the quality of medical literature.
  • This framework supports evidence-based practice in clinical decision-making and policy development.