Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Screening Tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnant Women: An Extended and Updated Systematic Review and
Babak Amra1, Masoud Mansouri2, Forogh Soltaninejad1
1Bamdad Respiratory and Sleep Research Center, Pulmonary and Sleep Ward, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in pregnant women show poor to moderate accuracy. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) performed worst, indicating a need for better screening methods for OSA during pregnancy.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Pulmonology
- Sleep Medicine
Background:
- Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) prevalence rises during pregnancy, impacting maternal and fetal health.
- Accurate screening tools are crucial for timely diagnosis and management of OSA in pregnant individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic validity of the Berlin, STOP-Bang, and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) questionnaires for OSA in pregnant women.
- To assess the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of these common screening tools in this specific population.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to March 2022.
- Data from 8 eligible studies involving 710 pregnant women with suspected OSA were extracted by two independent reviewers.
- Bivariate random-effects models were employed to calculate pooled accuracy measures, including sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and DOR.
Main Results:
- The Berlin questionnaire showed pooled sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 61%.
- The STOP-Bang questionnaire demonstrated pooled sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 80%.
- The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) exhibited pooled sensitivity of 29% and specificity of 80%, with overall poorer performance characteristics compared to the other two.
Conclusions:
- The Berlin, STOP-Bang, and ESS questionnaires demonstrate limited to moderate accuracy in screening for OSA in pregnant women.
- The ESS appears to be the least effective screening tool in this population.
- Further research is necessary to identify and validate more effective screening methods for OSA during pregnancy.
Related Concept Videos
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Antitussives, Expectorants, and Mucolytics
Antitussives include codeine, dextromethorphan (Robitussin), and benzonatate (Tessalon). Codeine and dextromethorphan exert their effects centrally by suppressing the cough reflex center in the medulla. Benzonatate operates peripherally within the respiratory tract by...
Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...

