Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

118
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
118
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

1.3K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal acceleration drives the probability cueing effect in visual search: Evidence for early attentional deployment (N1pc) at high-probability locations.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct replication of Eimer (1996).

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Guidance of attention by irrelevant contents of working memory is transient.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Electrophysiological evidence for the optimal tuning of attention.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Persistent effects of salience in visual working memory: Limits of cue-driven guidance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Priming of pop-out in the spatial-cueing paradigm.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K

Effects of spatial location on distractor interference.

Dirk Kerzel1,2,3, Martin Constant1,4,5

  • 1Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education, Université de Genève, Genève, Switzerland.

Journal of Vision
|September 6, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial competition resolves neural ambiguity. However, higher perceptual performance regions may not always increase distractor interference, challenging the bottom-up bias hypothesis in visual attention.

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.6K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.6K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.6K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Neural activity ambiguity arises when target and distractor stimuli are spatially close.
  • Spatial competition, influenced by bottom-up (saliency) and top-down (target match) biases, is proposed to resolve this ambiguity.
  • Visual performance exhibits known anisotropies, such as better performance along the horizontal meridian and in the lower visual hemifield.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test if regions with high perceptual performance introduce a bottom-up bias, leading to greater distractor interference.
  • To investigate the role of visual field anisotropies in distractor interference patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of target and distractor stimulus locations (meridians vs. diagonals, horizontal vs. vertical, upper vs. lower visual hemifield).
  • Measurement of distractor interference effects on perceptual performance.
  • Analysis of interference patterns in relation to known visual performance anisotropies.

Main Results:

  • Distractor interference was greater on the horizontal than the vertical meridian, consistent with performance anisotropies.
  • Contrary to predictions, distractors in the lower visual hemifield showed less interference than in the upper hemifield.
  • Distractor interference was higher for stimuli on meridians compared to diagonals, suggesting attentional scanning anisotropies.

Conclusions:

  • The hypothesis that high perceptual performance regions consistently increase distractor interference is only partially supported.
  • Visual performance anisotropies do not fully predict distractor interference, indicating complex interactions between bottom-up and top-down factors.
  • Attentional scanning patterns may also influence distractor interference in specific visual field locations.