Exploring the Congruence of actigraphy and the Pediatric Autism Insomnia rating Scale

Megan L Wenzell1, Cynthia R Johnson2, Luc Lecavalier3

  • 1Case Western Reserve University Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, 9501 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Sleep Medicine
|September 6, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Actigraphy and the Pediatric Autism Insomnia Rating Scale (PAIRS) do not agree in assessing sleep problems in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This suggests different aspects of sleep are measured by each method.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Sleep Medicine
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Biomedical Engineering (Sleep Monitoring)

Background:

  • Insomnia is a prevalent issue in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
  • The Pediatric Autism Insomnia Rating Scale (PAIRS) was recently developed and validated to assess sleep problems in this population.
  • Understanding the agreement between subjective/parent-reported measures and objective measures is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the associations and agreements between actigraphy (an objective sleep measure) and the PAIRS (a parent-rated scale) in children with ASD.
  • To determine if PAIRS effectively identifies children with poor sleep as defined by actigraphy parameters.

Main Methods:

  • 134 children with ASD, with and without sleep problems, were assessed using parent-rated and clinician measures.
  • A subset of 70 children underwent wrist-worn actigraphy for five consecutive nights.
  • Spearman correlations and Cohen's Kappa were used to evaluate associations and agreements between PAIRS scores and actigraphy indices (TST, SE%).

Main Results:

  • No significant correlations were found between PAIRS scores and actigraphy indices (SOL, WASO, TST, SE%).
  • A substantial proportion of children were classified as "poor sleepers" by actigraphy for Total Sleep Time (48.6%) and Sleep Efficiency (52.9%), compared to PAIRS (32.9%).
  • Agreements between PAIRS and actigraphy for identifying poor sleepers were low (Kappa = 0.11 for TST, 0.27 for SE%).

Conclusions:

  • Actigraphy and the PAIRS demonstrate poor agreement in assessing sleep in children with ASD.
  • Actigraphy primarily measures movement and estimates specific sleep parameters like TST and SE%.
  • PAIRS provides a broader assessment, incorporating subjective sleep disturbance and sleep-related functional impairment.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos