Rural-Urban Differences in Self-Reported Participation in Diabetes Self-Management Education
Emma Boswell1, Jan Probst, Peiyin Hung
1Rural and Minority Health Research Center, (Ms Boswell and Drs Probst and Crouch); Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, (Drs Hung and Crouch); and College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina (Dr Herbert).
Context:
Rural America faces a dual challenge with a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (hereafter, diabetes) and diabetes-related mortality. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) can improve glucose control and reduce adverse effects of diabetes, but certified DSME programs remain disproportionately limited in rural counties than in urban counties.
Objective:
The goal of this study is to examine the proportion of urban and rural adults who report having received DSME using a nationwide, 29-state survey while considering the potential consequences of lower service availability.
Design:
This cross-sectional study used data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Residence was defined as urban (metropolitan county) vs rural (non-metropolitan county). Logistic regression, incorporated survey weights, was used to determine the odds of having received DSME by residence.
Setting:
BRFSS is a nationally representative survey, and this study included participants from 29 states that were distributed throughout all regions of the United States.
Participants:
The study sample consisted of 28,179 adults who reported having diabetes, lived in one of the states that administered the diabetes module in 2019, and answered all relevant questions.
Main Outcome Measures:
The main outcome measure was whether a participant had ever received DSME. Participants were considered to have received DSME if they self-reported having ever taken a class on how to manage diabetes themselves.
Results:
Overall, 54.5% of participants reported having received DSME; proportionately fewer rural residents (50.4%, ±1.1%) than urban residents (55.5%, ±1.0%) reported DSME. Rural disparities persisted after adjusting for demographic, enabling, and need factors (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 0.79; CI, 0.71-0.89). By sociodemographic factors, Hispanic persons vs non-Hispanic White persons and single vs married/coupled individuals were less likely to report DSME receipt (both 0.76 [0.62-0.94]).
Conclusions:
Ongoing national efforts addressing rural disparities in diabetes-related complications should target individuals most at risk for missing current diabetes educational programming and design appropriate interventions.
More Related Videos
05:59Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
07:31A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020
Related Concept Videos
01:22Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
01:22Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
01:15Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
02:16Surveys
01:15Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...