Consideration of absolute intensity when examining sex differences in blood pressure responses during static exercise

Low- to moderate-intensity submaximal static contractions are commonly used to study the effects of biological sex on the cardiovascular response to exercise. Under this paradigm, premenopausal females frequently demonstrate smaller blood pressure responses than age-matched males. These differences are preserved during postexercise circulatory occlusion, implicating the muscle metaboreflex as an important driver of sex differences in the blood pressure response to static exercise. The mechanisms responsible for these differences are incompletely understood but often attributed to innate sex differences in skeletal muscle fiber type distribution, muscle metabolism, and/or sympathetic control of the circulation. However, one potential confounding factor is that the majority of studies use relative intensity exercise (e.g., 30% of maximal voluntary contraction), such that on average, females are completing static contractions at a lower absolute intensity. In this review, we summarize human evidence showing that sex differences in blood pressure responses to static exercise are attenuated or abolished when controlling for absolute intensity and muscle strength, either by statistical methods or strength-matched cohorts. We highlight evidence that the effect of higher absolute contraction intensity on exercise blood pressure likely occurs through increased mechanical occlusion of skeletal muscle microvasculature, leading to greater activation of the muscle metaboreflex. These findings highlight an important need to account for absolute intensity when studying and interpreting sex differences in cardiovascular responses to exercise.