Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medical Physics ends print.

Medical physics·2023
Same author

IMRT QA result prediction via MLC transmission decomposition.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2023
Same author

Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2022
Same author

Static MLC transmission simulation using two-dimensional ray tracing.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2022
Same author

Prospective Study of PET/MRI Tumor Response During Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Low-risk and Intermediate-risk p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer.

American journal of clinical oncology·2022
Same author

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for an Arteriovenous Malformation of the Oral Tongue: A Teaching Case.

Advances in radiation oncology·2022
Same journal

Synthetic CT-enabled weekly adaptive radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Optimizing plan adaptation triggers through volumetric-dosimetric monitoring.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Method for simultaneous selection of treatment isocenters and margins for polymetastatic extracranial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Pulse‑level characterization of low monitor unit deliveries on a modern linear accelerator using a plastic scintillation detector.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Improving image quality in terbium-161 phantom imaging: Quantitative evaluation of DEW and TEW scatter correction methods.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Latent density discrepancies in commercial lung-equivalent inserts and their clinical dosimetric impact.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for patient-specific quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on anatomical structures.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.3K

Portability of IMRT QA between matched linear accelerators.

Brendan Barraclough1, Zacariah E Labby2, Sean P Frigo2

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|September 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) measurements are consistent across matched treatment delivery systems (TDS). This validates the common beam model approach for improved clinical operations.

Keywords:
IMRT QAbeam matchmatched linacspatient specific QAportability

More Related Videos

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.7K
Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.3K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.7K
Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 9, 2014

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology

Background:

  • Accurate quality assurance (QA) is crucial for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
  • Verifying consistency across different treatment delivery systems (TDS) is essential for reliable patient treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess if patient-specific IMRT QA measurements are interchangeable between matched TDS.
  • To validate the accuracy of a common beam model for multiple TDS.

Main Methods:

  • Three VMAT plans of varying complexity were delivered on three matched Varian TrueBeam TDS.
  • Dose distributions were measured using a Scandidos Delta4 Phantom+ and compared to TPS calculations via gamma analysis.
  • Round-robin comparisons between TDS measurements were performed using dose difference metrics.

Main Results:

  • Over 95% of points passed gamma analysis (3%/3mm) when comparing measurements to calculations.
  • Inter-TDS dose deviations were minimal, with median differences within 1.0% under local normalization.
  • Tightest passing gamma criteria were similar across TDS, indicating high consistency.

Conclusions:

  • Matched TDS deliver dose distributions meeting stringent QA tolerances.
  • The common beam model accurately represents multiple TDS, enabling consistent QA.
  • Small inter-TDS dose differences support the common beam model for operational improvements.