Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Revisiting the Domenico plume formula through saddle-point asymptotics.

Journal of contaminant hydrology·2026
Same author

Explaining the impact of mutations on quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in mixed plastic wastes.

Chemosphere·2019
Same author

The effects of rapid weight loss and 3-h recovery on energy expenditure, carbohydrate, and fat oxidation in boxing athletes.

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness·2018
Same author

The small molecule STF-62247 induces apoptotic and autophagic cell death in leukemic cells.

Oncotarget·2018
Same author

Safety trial of tadalafil administered for the treatment of preeclampsia.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. I. Collection of Virus Samples
10:48

EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. I. Collection of Virus Samples

Published on: March 28, 2015

12.2K

Enabling quantitative comparison of wastewater surveillance data across methods through data standardization without

Noriko Endo1, Aika Hisahara2, Yukiko Kameda3

  • 1Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, 1-2 Yumihama, Otsu, Shiga 520-0811, Japan.

The Science of the Total Environment
|September 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Wastewater surveillance for pathogens like SARS-CoV-2 is growing but faces data comparison challenges. This study introduces a method using wastewater reference samples to measure and correct for quantification biases, enabling more reliable global data analysis.

Keywords:
Data standardizationInter-lab studyQuantitative data comparisonWastewater surveillance

More Related Videos

Comparison of Scale in a Photosynthetic Reactor System for Algal Remediation of Wastewater
05:40

Comparison of Scale in a Photosynthetic Reactor System for Algal Remediation of Wastewater

Published on: March 6, 2017

9.0K
Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. I. Collection of Virus Samples
10:48

EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. I. Collection of Virus Samples

Published on: March 28, 2015

12.2K
Comparison of Scale in a Photosynthetic Reactor System for Algal Remediation of Wastewater
05:40

Comparison of Scale in a Photosynthetic Reactor System for Algal Remediation of Wastewater

Published on: March 6, 2017

9.0K
Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
12:50

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds

Published on: September 26, 2017

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental microbiology
  • Public health surveillance
  • Molecular diagnostics

Background:

  • Global expansion of wastewater surveillance for infectious diseases, including COVID-19.
  • Methodological variations in assays hinder inter-laboratory data comparison.
  • Limitations of using spiked surrogates for accurate quantification bias assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a straightforward and cost-effective method for measuring relative quantification biases in wastewater surveillance.
  • To establish a reliable approach for standardizing wastewater surveillance data across different laboratories and methods.
  • To enable accurate global data comparison for public health decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • An inter-laboratory study utilizing non-spiked, field-obtained wastewater samples as reference materials.
  • Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 and pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) RNA concentrations using seven lab-assay combinations.
  • Determination of method-specific relative quantification biases using reference samples.

Main Results:

  • Significant variations in RNA quantification were observed across different methods.
  • Relative quantification biases were consistent across different reference wastewater samples.
  • Method-specific bias correction factors were identified as consistent and applicable.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method effectively measures method-dependent quantification biases in wastewater surveillance.
  • Method-specific bias correction factors can standardize data, facilitating quantitative comparisons across diverse surveillance programs.
  • This approach holds significant potential for improving the reliability and comparability of global wastewater surveillance data.