Comparison of treatment results between microvascular decompression and gamma knife radiosurgery in primary...

This study aims to analyze and evaluate the comparative clinical outcomes associated with microvascular decompression (MVD) and gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), focusing on pain relief, pain recurrence, and complications encountered in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Among 155 surgical procedures performed for TN (90 GKRS, and 65 MVD) between March 1997 and December 2020, the exclusion criteria encompassed prior surgical interventions, the presence of other pathological conditions such as tumors, vascular diseases, and multiple sclerosis, as well as patients who were lost to follow-up. Ultimately, 101 patients received their initial treatment for primary TN (47 GKRS, and 54 MVD) and were followed up for more than 1 year. The MVD procedures utilized the suboccipital retrosigmoid sinus approach, whereas GKRS was conducted with MR imaging guidance, employing a single 4mm isocenter, with median GKRS doses of 80 Gy. We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics, including sites of divisions, distributions of pain, and clinical outcomes. The assessment of outcomes was performed utilizing the Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with evaluations taking place preoperatively and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Postoperative VAS scores for patients undergoing either MVD or GKRS demonstrated a significant improvement when compared with their preoperative counterparts. The reduction in postoperative VAS scores within the MVD group was significantly more substantial than that observed in patients who underwent GKRS at the initial postoperative evaluations (P = .037). The maintenance of pain relief after MVD proved significantly superior to that following GKRS (P < .01). Both MVD and GKRS present as safe and efficacious therapeutic options for individuals diagnosed with primary TN, though MVD displayed superior initial outcomes in terms of pain relief and its maintenance. However, for older patients or those with medical contraindications to invasive procedures, GKRS emerges as a viable and less invasive alternative for initial treatment in cases of primary TN.