Resorbable Microspheres versus Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres for Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized

Kichang Han1, So Yeon Kim1, Man-Deuk Kim1

  • 1From the Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea (K.H., M.D.K., J.H.K., G.M.K., S.M., J.P., H.C.K., J.Y.W., T.M.A.D., J.C., D.K.K.); Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., J.Y.); and Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (H.J.S.).

Radiology
|September 10, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Resorbable microspheres (RMs) and permanent trisacryl gelatin microspheres (TAGMs) show similar effectiveness for uterine artery embolization (UAE) in treating fibroids, with no significant differences in pain or ovarian function. However, RMs led to higher uterine artery recanalization rates.

Related Concept Videos