Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
Published on: January 5, 2024
Hybrid machine learning approach integrating GMDH and SVR for heavy metal concentration prediction in dust samples
Jamshid Piri1, Mohammad Reza Rezaei Kahkha2, Ozgur Kisi3,4
1Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Soil & Water, University of Zabol, P.O. Box: 98615-538, Zabol, Iran. j.piri@uoz.ac.ir.
Abstract:
In agricultural regions prone to dust storms, heavy metal contamination of soil and crops from airborne particulates poses significant risks to food safety and public health. This study has assessed the potential of machine learning models for predicting concentrations of toxic heavy metals like arsenic, chromium, and lead in dust from the agricultural Sistan region of southeastern Iran. This region experiences frequent dust storms mobilizing particulates from local dried lakes onto agricultural lands. The metals including nickel, copper, magnesium, cobalt, zinc, chromium, arsenic, and lead were measured in summer dust samples during 2012-2018 across 15 stations. Two hybrid models were developed combining group method of data handling (GMDH) and support vector regression (SVR) machine learning with harmony search optimization (H) so as to predict toxic metals arsenic, chromium, and lead using nickel, copper, magnesium, cobalt, and zinc inputs. Standard error maps were uncertainty higher in southern and western areas, and they are most impacted by dust storms. Results demonstrated that the hybrid GMDH + H and SVR + H models improved the accuracy of individual GMDH and SVR models in predicting heavy metals. The GMDH + H model performed the best for the lead with an agreement index (d-index) of 0.98, root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.87 ppm, normalized RMSE (NRMSE) of 0.12, and coefficient of determination (RR) of 0.96. The SVR + H model showed the highest accuracy for arsenic and chromium, obtaining d-index 0.96, RMSE 0.47 ppm, NRMSE 0.09, and RR 0.92 for arsenic, and d-index 0.96, RMSE 11.24 ppm, NRMSE 0.16, and RR 0.93 for chromium. Taylor's diagram and heatmap analysis confirmed the superiority of the hybrid techniques. This work demonstrates the utility of state-of-the-art computing for addressing complex environmental health challenges.
More Related Videos
11:18A Practical Guide on Coupling a Scanning Mobility Sizer and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer SMPS-ICPMS
Published on: July 11, 2017
10:31Detection and Recovery of Palladium, Gold and Cobalt Metals from the Urban Mine Using Novel Sensors/Adsorbents Designated with Nanoscale Wagon-wheel-shaped Pores
Published on: December 6, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)